Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "3a8c6de1".
2009 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] Google's Go
On Thursday 19 November 2009 19:48:18 Owen Anderson wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
> >> In this case, the assertion that LLVM is slow is correct: it's
> >> definitely slower than a non-optimizing compiler.
> >
> > I'm *very* surprised by this and will test it myself...
I've tested it and LLVM is indeed 2x slower to compile,
2009 Nov 19
7
[LLVMdev] Google's Go
On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>
>
>> In this case, the assertion that LLVM is slow is correct: it's
>> definitely slower than a non-optimizing compiler.
>
> I'm *very* surprised by this and will test it myself...
Compared to a compiler in the same category as PCC, whose pinnacle of optimization is doing register allocation? I'm not