search for: 3a179ff3

It isn't Win32 code at all. It depends on Unix emulation. Oh, all right. I'll take a crack at it. I'm an experienced Windows programmer (but I was programming Unix before Windows even existed). I was tempted to volunteer but Henrik beat me to it and anyway I'm not sure if I can afford to spend the time required to do this. It's not just System/Win32. To properly build

Yes, it should. I haven't reviewed Henrik's change set yet but if it doesn't look like clean Win32 code then I will create a separate target named MingW and adjust the configure script accordingly. On the other hand, no one has submitted any Win32 patches yet, so first come first served :) Reid. On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 19:35, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Uh... shouldn't a Win32 port use

...cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040913/3a179ff3/attachment.sig>