search for: 3988

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 Summary: -a collides with --flags Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org Repor...

Feb 17 12:48:00 pepino postfix/smtps/smtpd[3988]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1] Feb 17 12:48:01 pepino postfix/smtps/smtpd[3988]: warning: unknown smtpd restriction: "permit_ssl_authenticated" Feb 17 12:48:01 pepino postfix/smtps/smtpd[3988]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from localhost[127.0.0.1]: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration error; fro...

...elements from that vector. I have a problem defining a pattern to replace the digits using for example "sub". Removing the ".tif" part works fine using sub('.tif',"",x), but how do I get rid of the four preceding digits? Thanks for your help, Kim Input: [3988] "060907_17_3_5_1_1_2909.tif" "060907_17_3_5_2_1_2910.tif" "060907_17_3_5_3_1_2911.tif" [3991] "060907_17_3_5_4_1_2912.tif" "060907_17_3_5_5_1_2913.tif" "060907_17_3_5_6_1_2914.tif" Desired output: [3988] "060907_17_3_5_1_1_&...

...filter_queue Test setup: # iptables -F # iptables -I INPUT -j NFQUEUE --queue-num 1 # ./nfqnl_test So far everything is ok. I can see packets flowing via the queue. First a working large ICMP packet: $ ping -c 4 -s 3980 localhost PING localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) 3980(4008) bytes of data. 3988 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.069 ms 3988 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.078 ms 3988 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.091 ms 3988 bytes from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1): icmp...

...ll, this is postfix log, which is not very useful when debugging dovecot problems... > > > > Aki > > > >> On 17 February 2019 at 19:50 Latin Bishop <soydepr at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Feb 17 12:48:00 pepino postfix/smtps/smtpd[3988]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1] > >> Feb 17 12:48:01 pepino postfix/smtps/smtpd[3988]: warning: unknown smtpd restriction: "permit_ssl_authenticated" > >> Feb 17 12:48:01 pepino postfix/smtps/smtpd[3988]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from localhost[127.0.0.1]: 451 4.3.5 Ser...

Yes it is. Basically can?t send nor receive confit looks good > On Feb 17, 2019, at 12:34 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > Is user 'dovecot' member of group 'mail'? > > Aki > >> On 17 February 2019 at 19:28 Latin Bishop <soydepr at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Changed permissions but still have

Today (2012-08-23) on CRAN [1]: "Currently, the CRAN package repository features 4001 available packages." These packages are maintained by approximately 2350 different folks. Previous milestones: 2011-05-12: 3,000 packages [1] 2009-10-04: 2,000 packages [2] 2007-04-12: 1,000 packages [3] 2004-10-01: 500 packages [4] 2003-04-01: 250 packages [4] [1]

...rl and then under the hood raises events and other things, but from an HTML perspective it is just the POST method) then the page is re-rendered back to the client, and that is when I get a JS error on line 3989. That seems to be the code for faking the DOMContentLoaded event for IE. The code is: 3988: document.write("<script id=__onDOMContentLoaded defer src=//:><\/script>"); 3989: $("__onDOMContentLoaded").onreadystatechange = function() { The error I get is that $("__onDOMContentLoaded") is null. Going into a debugger it seems that the documen...

...add 0x43b1bd0, 0x43b1ce0 [ORD=3] [ID=15] ... Which seems odd -- it appears as if it ignored the Expand and just tried to continue onto selection for 64bit add as if it had been legal? And a different example: %res = shl i64 %0, 1 aborts with error: llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp:3988: void {anonymous}::SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode(llvm::SDNode*): Assertion `VT.isVector() && "Unable to legalize non-vector shift"' failed. So, it seems to me that a whole bunch of other code will need to be added or modified, too, to teach LLVM how to expand i64 to i32 op...

.../01 06:00 3971 2005/01/01 07:00 3970 2005/01/01 08:00 3962 2005/01/01 09:00 3992 2005/01/01 10:00 3955 2005/01/01 11:00 3963 2005/01/01 12:00 3965 2005/01/01 13:00 3947 2005/01/01 14:00 3959 2005/01/01 15:00 3978 2005/01/01 16:00 3967 2005/01/01 17:00 3978 2005/01/01 18:00 3988 2005/01/01 19:00 4043 2005/01/01 20:00 4026 2005/01/01 21:00 3996 2005/01/01 22:00 3967 2005/01/01 23:00 3969 2005/01/02 00:00 3976 2005/01/02 01:00 3969 2005/01/02 02:00 3955 2005/01/02 03:00 3984 2005/01/02 04:00 3971 2005/01/02 05:00 3960 2005/01/02 06:00 3951 2005/01/02...

...[2]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_PEAK=0.89843750 comment[3]: REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN=-5.67 dB comment[4]: TITLE=A Saucerful of Secrets comment[5]: ARTIST=Pink Floyd comment[6]: ALBUM=A Saucerful of Secrets comment[7]: TRACKNUMBER=05 comment[8]: DATE=1968 METADATA block #3 type: 1 (PADDING) is last: true length: 3988 -------------- next part -------------- METADATA block #0 type: 0 (STREAMINFO) is last: false length: 34 minumum blocksize: 4608 samples maximum blocksize: 4608 samples minimum framesize: 2066 bytes maximum framesize: 13776 bytes sample_rate: 44100 Hz channels: 2 bits-per-sampl...

...0.6 752:44.78 glusterfs 1334 root 20 0 2694264 56988 1672 S 16.3 1.5 311:20.90 ganesha.nfsd 27458 root 20 0 108984 1404 540 D 3.0 0.0 0:00.24 dd 14127 root 20 0 1164720 4860 1960 S 0.7 0.1 1:47.59 glusterfs 750 root 20 0 389864 5528 3988 S 0.3 0.1 0:08.77 sssd_be -- Cheers, Tom K. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Living on earth is expensive, but it includes a free trip around the sun.

[FreeBSD 7-STABLE/i386] Hello, I've got a 100 % reproductible panic with ipsec when using a 'ping -s 4000'. It works without ipsec My ipsec setup is very simple, i just use setkey: /etc/ipsec.conf flush; spdflush; add 192.168.1.21 192.168.1.200 esp 1011 -E rijndael-cbc "0123456789012345"; add 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.21 esp 1012 -E rijndael-cbc

...1 08:00 3962 > 2005/01/01 09:00 3992 > 2005/01/01 10:00 3955 > 2005/01/01 11:00 3963 > 2005/01/01 12:00 3965 > 2005/01/01 13:00 3947 > 2005/01/01 14:00 3959 > 2005/01/01 15:00 3978 > 2005/01/01 16:00 3967 > 2005/01/01 17:00 3978 > 2005/01/01 18:00 3988 > 2005/01/01 19:00 4043 > 2005/01/01 20:00 4026 > 2005/01/01 21:00 3996 > 2005/01/01 22:00 3967 > 2005/01/01 23:00 3969 > 2005/01/02 00:00 3976 > 2005/01/02 01:00 3969 > 2005/01/02 02:00 3955 > 2005/01/02 03:00 3984 > 2005/01/02 04:00 3971 > 2005...

...tin_firmware(%struct.firmware* nocapture %fw, i8* nocapture readonly %name) #0 { tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata !{%struct.firmware* %fw}, i64 0, metadata !3985, metadata !3750), !dbg !3986 tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata !{i8* %name}, i64 0, metadata !3987, metadata !3750), !dbg !3988 tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata !3839, i64 0, metadata !3989, metadata !3750), !dbg !3990 br label %1, !dbg !3991 ; <label>:1 ; preds = %13, %0 %b_fw.02 = phi %struct.builtin_fw* [ getelementptr inbounds ([0 x %struct.builtin_fw]* @__start_bui...

...3992 >> 2005/01/01 10:00 3955 >> 2005/01/01 11:00 3963 >> 2005/01/01 12:00 3965 >> 2005/01/01 13:00 3947 >> 2005/01/01 14:00 3959 >> 2005/01/01 15:00 3978 >> 2005/01/01 16:00 3967 >> 2005/01/01 17:00 3978 >> 2005/01/01 18:00 3988 >> 2005/01/01 19:00 4043 >> 2005/01/01 20:00 4026 >> 2005/01/01 21:00 3996 >> 2005/01/01 22:00 3967 >> 2005/01/01 23:00 3969 >> 2005/01/02 00:00 3976 >> 2005/01/02 01:00 3969 >> 2005/01/02 02:00 3955 >> 2005/01/02 03:00 3984 &g...

...Which seems odd -- it appears as if it ignored the Expand and just tried to continue onto selection for 64bit add as if it had been legal? >> >> And a different example: >> %res = shl i64 %0, 1 >> aborts with error: >> llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp:3988: void {anonymous}::SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandNode(llvm::SDNode*): Assertion `VT.isVector() && "Unable to legalize non-vector shift"' failed. >> >> So, it seems to me that a whole bunch of other code will need to be added or modified, too, to teach LLVM how to ex...

...3821 3822 3824 3826 3836 3837 3838 3840 3841 3842 3848 3850 3854 3855 3856 3857 3858 3864 3868 3870 3871 3878 3884 3888 3898 3900 3901 3902 3903 3904 3905 3912 3914 3915 3916 3917 3918 3921 3924 3927 3928 3930 3931 3932 3935 3946 3947 3948 3949 3951 3952 3954 3957 3958 3961 3963 3964 3971 3981 3985 3988 4007 4014 4015 .Data .Names ? ? ?` ... =================================== Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals in America by U.S.News & World Report (2010). Visit us online at http://www.clevelandcli...

...;'xen.util.vusb_util.UsbDeviceParseError''> Please report to xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/xm", line 7, in <module> main.main(sys.argv) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xen/xm/main.py", line 3988, in main _, rc = _run_cmd(cmd, cmd_name, args) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xen/xm/main.py", line 4012, in _run_cmd return True, cmd(args) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/xen/xm/main.py", line 3057, in xm_usb_attach if vusb_util.bus_is_assign...

Hi again, my last example wasn''t good either. It really makes only sense in the context of using Thread. I finally came up with this code, that should now test all important aspects of running a task in a background thread (to keep it simple, I left out the exception handling). see http://pastie.caboo.se/35559 or end of mail. It seems, TaskRunner is now very well covered by the