Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "391775e".
Did you mean:
391775
2017 Nov 24
1
[PATCH v2] VSOCK: Don't call vsock_stream_has_data in atomic context
...d-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com>
---
net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 10 +++++++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
index 391775e..56573dc 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
@@ -797,9 +797,13 @@ static void vmci_transport_handle_detach(struct sock *sk)
/* We should not be sending anymore since the peer won't be
* there to receive, but we can still receive if there is...
2017 Nov 24
1
[PATCH v2] VSOCK: Don't call vsock_stream_has_data in atomic context
...d-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com>
---
net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 10 +++++++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
index 391775e..56573dc 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
@@ -797,9 +797,13 @@ static void vmci_transport_handle_detach(struct sock *sk)
/* We should not be sending anymore since the peer won't be
* there to receive, but we can still receive if there is...