Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "3911c816".
Did you mean:
3910c81b
2004 Sep 10
0
Re: nice idea
...ourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flac-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20021005/3911c816/attachment.pgp
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: nice idea
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:57:03PM -0400, Hod McWuff wrote:
> Agreed that the oversampling isn't useful in the long term. I'm not sure
> what you mean by 'dictioniary overhead'.
>
> I'd like to see an easy-to-invoke set of parameters that will spare no
> cpu expense and produce the tightest theoretically possible output.
>
> I'm guessing the best of