search for: 38mb

Hi I was surprised with size of Theora files and thought of feedback. Following 1minute duration Theora and Xvid files were made from a y4m file. The resolution is 1280x720: 1. Xvid 17MB 2. Ogg/Theora Q7 31MB 3. Ogg/Theora Q8 38MB 4. Ogg/Theora Q9 49MB 5. Ogg/Theora Q10 61MB The Xvid file was made using mencoder by 2 passes with following options: bitrate=2500:autoaspect:chroma_opt:vhq=4:bvhq=1:quant_type=mpeg:pass=1 The encoder_example was used to create Ogg/Theora files. It was noted y4m to Theora encoding was the fa...

...-xfs i386 6.8.2-1.EL.18 base 319 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 29 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 38 M 38Mb and xorg-x11 seems a bit too much for a "simple" heartbeat, no ? -- Martin Hamant

...TEST RESULTS ------------ The test is simple: write 1GB of data to disk and measure bandwidth and cpu usage. - tapdisk2 on raw file bandwidth: 32MB/s average cpu usage: 22% - qemu on raw file bandwidth: 33MB/s average cpu usage: 12% - blkback on LVM bandwidth: 39MB/s - qemu on LVM bandwidth: 38MB/s CONCLUSIONS ----------- Qemu beats tapdisk2 on raw files (the bandwidth is the same but the cpu usage is lower). Qemu has similar performances to blkback on LVM from the bandwidth perspective, but I didn''t measure the cpu usage in that case. Cheers, Stefano ______________________...

...#39;s release. Personally, I'm quite content with the format as is. Encoding at 96k still gives dumbfoundingly good quality and altogether I think you folks have done an excellent job. Unfortunately, I can't play these anywhere but on a computer. I ordered a HipZip, in spite of the mere 38MB per disk (tho the media isn't overly expensive), having heard that when version 1.0 is released so will be a vorbis-supporting firmware. Any news on when I and others like myself can expect to listen to ogg on the go would be great. Also, since i'm still wary about the small amount of sto...

Currently at my university we are running many servers with Centos 4.6 and everything is okay, but when a user does a large operation such as 'cp' or 'tar' or 'rsync' all of the physical memory gets exhausted. Our lab servers have 32GB physical to 64GB of physical memory and when a user does a large copy which involves very small but over 10k files eventually we see a kswap

Hi all, I am doing some intensive computation right now. My system is Pentium4 3.20G + 1.0G RAM + WindowsXP + R1.9.1. It seems my computer is very powerful. However, when I do some simple matrix algebra operations based on a matrix (DD) with dimension 5000000 by 2, I found that the consumption of RAM is huge. For example, the command a <- 1 - DD[,2] eats my 100M RAM. Does anyone know how

...They're showing up initially as /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd. If I go after the iSCSI devices in Dom0, with dd, for instance, they work fine all day. I can read and write the entire devices to and from local files without error. iSCSI seems to work properly in that regard. I'm getting about 38MB/s. I've scrubbed the disk pool and no errors were found and long SMART self-test passed on each of the disks. I've also been able to mount both iSCSI devices and run bonnie++ on them successfully from Dom0. So, I specify those devices in the Xen config for the domU (tried both real d...

Hmm--either the indexing process is still running, or it''s broken again. It''s 0443 GMT, and I can''t get the search engine to find anything on the mailing list or the web site (I used ''dns'' as my search term). It''s not that big of an inconvenience, though--Googling for ''site:shorewall.net dns'' does pretty much the same thing.

...gt; doveadm(doveadm_mail_try_run+0x293) [0x8055d03] -> doveadm(main+0x3bd) [0x805eb5d] -> /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0xb7b89ebc] -> doveadm [0x8055061] Aborted Is there anything else I should try? or just wait to see if this happens again? the mailbox is not very big, around 38Mb in 84 mails. Thanks! Alex

...-pre-release branch) and I noticed my fcgis required roughly 6-8MBs more memory after just a couple requests. For example, each fcgi on edge would start around 40MB and rise to ~46MBs after a couple requests. I downgraded my app back to 1.1.6 and each fcgi would start at around 33MBs and rise to ~38MB. As a result of the increased memory requirements, my app can no longer be run on TextDrive using edge since they have a max resident memory cap of 48MBs which I would quickly hit (and they just kill your fcgi when you do). Is this increased memory requirement to be expected? I would be happy to...

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device