Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "389,52".
Did you mean:
389,5
2016 Nov 02
0
[PATCH v3 13/15] secboot: remove ls_ucode_mgr
...uct list_head imgs;
+ struct ls_ucode_img *img, *t;
+ int managed_count = 0;
+ u32 image_wpr_size;
int falcon_id;
int ret;
- ls_ucode_mgr_init(&mgr);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&imgs);
/* Load all LS blobs */
for_each_set_bit(falcon_id, &managed_falcons, NVKM_FALCON_END) {
@@ -417,48 +389,52 @@ acr_r352_prepare_ls_blob(struct acr_r352 *acr, u64 wpr_addr, u32 wpr_size,
ret = PTR_ERR(img);
goto cleanup;
}
- ls_ucode_mgr_add_img(&mgr, img);
+ list_add_tail(&img->node, &imgs);
+ managed_count++;
}
/*
* Fill the WPR and LSF headers with the right off...
2016 Dec 14
18
[PATCH v5 0/18] Secure Boot refactoring
Sending things in a smaller chunks since it makes their reviewing
easier.
This part part 2/3 of the secboot refactoring/PMU command support
patch series. Part 1 was the new falcon library which should be
merged soon now.
This series is mainly a refactoring/sanitization of the existing
secure boot code. It does not add new features (part 3 will).
Secure boot handling is now separated by NVIDIA
2016 Nov 02
15
[PATCH v3 00/15] Secure Boot refactoring
This is a rework of the secure boot code that moves the building of the blob
into its own set of source files (and own hooks), making the code more flexible
and (hopefully) easier to understand as well.
This rework is needed to support more signed firmware for existing and new
chips. Since the firmwares in question are not available yet I cannot send the
code to manage then, but hopefully the