search for: 384kb

First I''ll confess my sins, then I''ll beg for help. I own a small wireless ISP, and I sell service at three levels, 256kb/s, 384kb/s, and 512kb/s. For about 18 months, I thought I had this bandwidth limiting figured out. I had three HTB classes off the root, one each with the limits above. Since each customer has a single IP address, I used iptables to mark packets destined for each subscriber with level 1,2 or 3. It l...

Hi all, Just watching for my first time the 'oom-killer' call in a CentOS 4.2 workstation. System was running normally but with high load of nice process, iow, rosetta and seti, others appart, nautilus, etc... i realized that after a night of standby running normally, the next moorning after few manual operations from X-session in local console, it started a massive swapping, this time

...cable, the cable people seemed clueless to things like over selling bandwidth. But as time went along they got it better and better under control. Of course their natural competitor, DSL, created a bigger demand for them to get things under control. Today cable is often giving 3-4Mb down and 384Kb up, and DSL is usually 768Kb down and 384Kb up. (At least in my area.) Under normal Internet use all we really care about is downspeed. So cable is providing 68.27Kb/$-91.02Kb/$ and DSL 26.48Kb/$ making cable the easy choice. But with VoIP it has to go both ways and things like latency can easi...

...: Free pages: 49280kB (49280kB HighMem) Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: Active:28662 inactive:196240 dirty:60 writeback:0 unstable:0 free:12320 slab:11019 mapped:9351 pagetables:253 Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: DMA free:0kB min:16kB low:32kB high:48kB active:36kB inactive:12184kB present:16384kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: Normal free:0kB min:936kB low:1872kB high:2808kB active:93152kB inactive:747560kB present:901120kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: protect...

Hi there. I''ve two Internet connections at the same box, one connection is made through ADSL, and another is made with a Radio-Link (WaveLAN IE822). I wan''t to do a backup connection with the ADSL link. With what tools I can do this? ipchains, iptables, a third party tool? -- ____________________________________________________________ PIII 500MHz - 98MB RAM -

I have an Asterisk server that I use at work. I have a phone that is at home that logs into the Asterisk server at work. My home phone is hooked up via DSL through a Linksys router. You can see the my sip.conf for the phone blow. The problem is each time the phone rings I can hear/be heard 50% of the time. Any suggestion on what to look for. I do have my reg time set for 180 seconds on the

...cpu 3 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16 Node 0 HighMem per-cpu: empty Free pages: 16203544kB (0kB HighMem) Active:6029 inactive:29822 dirty:25578 writeback:1 unstable:0 free:4050886 slab:5003 mapped:4627 pagetables:272 Node 0 DMA free:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:16384kB pages_scanned:2 all_unreclaimable? yes protections[]: 0 0 0 Node 0 Normal free:16203608kB min:4216kB low:8432kB high:12648kB active:24116kB inactive:119288kB present:17809408kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no protections[]: 0 0 0 Node 0 HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:256kB high:384kB active:0...

...per-cpu: cpu 0 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1 cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1 Normal per-cpu: empty HighMem per-cpu: empty Free pages: 128kB (0kB HighMem) Active:642 inactive:1 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 free:32 slab:718 mapped:512 pagetables:87 DMA free:128kB low 256kB high 384kB active:2348kB inactive:0kB present:16000kB protections[]: 0 0 0 Normal free:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB protections[]: 0 0 0 HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:256kB high384kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB protections[]: 0 0 0 DMA: 2*4kB 1*8kB 1*16kB 3...

.../* . If I write a loop to rsync the files one-at-a-time by name, it works just fine. If I do the full sync from a client on the same 100Mb LAN as the server, it works just fine. I get the error when syncing over the internet: we've got a 1Mb SDSL connection, the AIX client is T1, the other a 384Kb ADSL. Once they are synced, I can re-run the all-at-once rsync at it doesn't time out. The last few lines from the -vvv output are: recv_generator(file_29,28) generating and sending sums for 28 recv_generator(file_30,29) generating and sending sums for 29 recv_generator(file_31,30) generatin...

Just discovered that on CentOS 4.1 when you issue the command: lvcreate -s -n temp -L2G /dev/vgname/lvname to create a snapshot, you get the error message: snapshot: Required device-mapper target(s) not detected in your kernel I've checked and recheck my spelling and tried using the device created under /dev/mapper. I've tried it on both x86_64 and on i386. Works as expected under

>From the <samba>/var/log/<client>.log file: doing parameter domain controller = AZPHXNT01 Unknown parameter encountered: "domain controller" Ignoring unknown parameter "domain controller" >From the smb.conf file: # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use

...ome IP on one LAN, but I''m in trouble. There is a linux 2.4.26 connected to the Internet (eth0) / LAN(eth1) doing NAT. I''m using VLANs in the LAN Interface, that is connected to a 3Com SuperStack II in a 802.1Q tagged port. I want to create a class that will limit the traffic at 384Kbit/s. I want to create two leaf classes that limit the traffic at 256Kbit/s for each one. I want to attach two sfq qdiscs so the classes are treated equally. I want to put filters that put one IP address for each 256 class (supose that are only two computers on LAN). When one computer is downloading...

...RAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0,global_oom,task_memcg=/system.slice/system-nsd.slice/nsd at trial.service,task=nsd: server 1,pid=709906,uid=111 23:32:33 kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 709906 (nsd: server 1) total-vm:14673408kB, anon-rss:13054016kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:384kB, UID:111 pgtables:28720kB oom_score_adj:0 23:32:40 kernel: oom_reaper: reaped process 709906 (nsd: server 1), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:512kB 23:32:40 kernel: oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0,global_oom,task_memcg=/system.slice/system-nsd...

...fsc (default realtime 32Kb upperlimit 412Kb) #queue http bandwidth 16% priority 2 qlimit 512 hfsc (realtime 16Kb upperlimit 490Kb ) #queue ssh bandwidth 16% priority 5 qlimit 512 hfsc (realtime 32Kb upperlimit 490Kb ) #queue stdack bandwidth 16% priority 5 qlimit 1024 hfsc ( realtime 8Kb upperlimit 384Kb) #queue vpn bandwidth 16% priority 6 qlimit 2048 hfsc ( realtime 16Kb upperlimit 512Kb) #queue ack bandwidth 16% priority 7 qlimit 1024 hfsc ( realtime 8Kb upperlimit 512Kb) #pass out quick on $if_ppp proto udp from any to any port {14567,14568} keep state queue(ssh, ack) #pass out quick on $if_pp...

Hello, I am running GlusterFS version 3.2.7-2~bpo60+1 on Debian 6.0.6. Today, I have experienced a a glusterfs process cause the server to invoke oom_killer. How exactly would I go about investigating this and coming up with a fix? -- Steve King Network/Linux Engineer - AdSafe Media Cisco Certified Network Professional CompTIA Linux+ Certified Professional CompTIA A+ Certified Professional

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93458 Bug ID: 93458 Summary: page allocation failure: order:5, mode:0x240c0c0 Product: xorg Version: 7.7 (2012.06) Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau