Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "3836612".
Did you mean:
3.36612
2018 Mar 19
0
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
..., 30.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 3.8 si,
0.0 st
%Cpu2 : 8.7 us, 6.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 48.7 id, 34.9 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.7 si,
0.0 st
%Cpu3 : 10.6 us, 7.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 57.1 id, 24.1 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.4 si,
0.0 st
KiB Mem : 3881708 total, 3543280 free, 224008 used, 114420 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 4063228 total, 3836612 free, 226616 used. 3457708 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
14115 root 20 0 2504832 27640 2612 S 43.5 0.7 432:10.35
glusterfsd
1319 root 20 0 1269620 23780 2636 S 38.9 0.6 752:44.78
glusterfs
1334 root 20...
2018 Mar 20
2
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
...; 0.0 st
> %Cpu2 : 8.7 us, 6.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 48.7 id, 34.9 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.7 si,
> 0.0 st
> %Cpu3 : 10.6 us, 7.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 57.1 id, 24.1 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.4 si,
> 0.0 st
> KiB Mem : 3881708 total, 3543280 free, 224008 used, 114420 buff/cache
> KiB Swap: 4063228 total, 3836612 free, 226616 used. 3457708 avail Mem
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 14115 root 20 0 2504832 27640 2612 S 43.5 0.7 432:10.35
> glusterfsd
> 1319 root 20 0 1269620 23780 2636 S 38.9 0.6 752:44.78
> gluste...
2018 Mar 19
3
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
Hi,
On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote:
> On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my
> own setup either.? For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage
> in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying
> to facilitate read / writes to the other bricks.
>
>