Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "37e7fc86".
2013 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Any objections to my importing GoogleMock to go with GoogleTest in LLVM?
On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> I have some concrete use cases in testing the pass manager where it will allow the tests of this API to be more thorough, less verbose, and easier to maintain. I'm not claiming to be the biggest fan of some features in GoogleMock, but on the whole, I think it's better than the alternative and will
2013 Nov 13
7
[LLVMdev] Any objections to my importing GoogleMock to go with GoogleTest in LLVM?
I have some concrete use cases in testing the pass manager where it will
allow the tests of this API to be more thorough, less verbose, and easier
to maintain. I'm not claiming to be the biggest fan of some features in
GoogleMock, but on the whole, I think it's better than the alternative and
will allow more careful testing of C++ APIs where the interesting part is
the API itself.
2013 Nov 14
3
[LLVMdev] Any objections to my importing GoogleMock to go with GoogleTest in LLVM?
...y don't expect it to be widely used, but I
expect it to make tests significantly more comprehensible and brief in the
limited cases where it applies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131114/37e7fc86/attachment.html>