Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "3784k".
Did you mean:
3784
2004 Aug 06
3
Another icecast2 question
...ip
once it was reloaded.
here's what top currently shows it as. Also for reference, a process
that I expect to take up the full cpu hasnt even been getting a chance
(though it is niced to 20)
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
7706 mike 64 0 3784K 1764K RUN 2:09 97.00% 96.88% icecast
184 root 68 20 912K 576K RUN 73.1H 0.00% 0.00% dnetc
Let me know if I should be seeing different numbers than these
Mike
--
<mystica@darktech.org>
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project...
2004 Aug 06
0
Another icecast2 question
...>here's what top currently shows it as. Also for reference, a process
>that I expect to take up the full cpu hasnt even been getting a chance
>(though it is niced to 20)
>
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND
> 7706 mike 64 0 3784K 1764K RUN 2:09 97.00% 96.88% icecast
> 184 root 68 20 912K 576K RUN 73.1H 0.00% 0.00% dnetc
>
>Let me know if I should be seeing different numbers than these
>
It should take little to no cpu (I haven't yet tested it with enough users
to take it above... 0...