search for: 376smb

...trace of one of the processes shows the following: poll([{fd=13, events=POLLIN|POLLHUP}, {fd=6, events=POLLIN|POLLHUP}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN|POLLHUP}, {fd=31, events=POLLIN|POLLHUP}], 4, 60000) = 1 ([{fd=31, revents=POLLIN}]) readv(31, [{"\0\0\0\230", 4}], 1) = 4 readv(31, [{"\376SMB@\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\5\0\1\0000\0\0\0\0\0\0\0V\1\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 152}], 1) = 152 gettimeofday({1530539063, 52936}, NULL) = 0 geteuid32() = 0 getegid32() = 0 setgroups32(3, [1000, 501, 2000]) = 0 setresgid32(-1, 1000, -1) =...

...0839090}) = 0 0.000555 clock_gettime64(CLOCK_REALTIME, {tv_sec=1730806466, tv_nsec=501842685}) = 0 0.000997 epoll_ctl(3, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 5, {events=EPOLLIN|EPOLLERR|EPOLLHUP, data={u32=37735016, u64=37735016}}) = 0 0.000889 writev(5, [{iov_base="\0\0\0\204", iov_len=4}, {iov_base="\376SMB@\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\5\0\1\0\20\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., iov_len=64}, {iov_base="9\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\237\1\2\0\0\0\0\0"..., iov_len=56}, {iov_base="s\0r\0v\0s\0v\0c\0", iov_len=12}], 4) = 136 0.005154 clock_gettime64(CLOCK_REALTIME, {tv_se...

On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:36:49 +0100 Gilles via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 04/11/2024 15:11, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > As I said previously, I do not think this has anything to do with > > Samba. In an earlier post, you had this output when you ran the same > > command using 'time': > > > > real 0m12.500s > > user

On 06/11/2024 08:04, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Take a closer look at strace.? You've already noticed > the recv() call takes a noticeable time, - find all of > them. > > BTW, in your strace output you omitted some important > pieces, for example, it isn't visible what FD#5 corresponds > to, since you omitted its creation/open. > > The prob might not be the (host)

...t;strace --relative-timestamps -o strace.smbclient.log smbclient -NL 127.0.0.1" : > > https://pastebin.com/raw/v3hFY5DB So, as you can see yourself, there are 2 interesting places (adding some context): 0.000442 writev(4, [{iov_base="\0\0\0\204", iov_len=4}, {iov_base="\376SMB@\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\5\0\1\0\20\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., iov_len=64}, {iov_base="9\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\237\1\2\0\0\0\0\0"..., iov_len=56}, {iov_base="s\0r\0v\0s\0v\0c\0", iov_len=12}], 4) = 136 8.996581 recv(4, "\0\0\0\230", 4, 0) =...

Hello, I've come across a curious issue with Samba 3.6.10. When running 'emacs' version GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.0.6002) of 2011-03-10 on 3249CTO on Windows Server 2008 SP2 x64 and issuing a file "revert" of one sort or another against a Samba-served file, the 'smbd' process leaks two or three handles. Eventually, when 16k handles are open, this causes

Hi , I shared linux directory which is mounted using ecryptfs to a windows 10 client using samba share . When i do a robocopy of file greater than size of 7GB the samba throws an error NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND which can be observed in wire shark  . Setup : ---------- Host with ubuntu 16.01  -------------------> windows 10 client (Samba