search for: 375mb

...it can't be caching the entire file locally. Seems strange > behaviour from the Windows redirector here. > I have uploaded the Linux packet capture here (14MB): https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6UHr3GQEkQwWXJ1NjVwMkJXOEU Also, here is the corresponding Windows packet capture as well (375MB): https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6UHr3GQEkQwbFhOY0lCcEFjZkU > Or alternatively, just use the Linux SMB client and don't port the software to Windows :-). You have no idea how much I wish that was possible :D I'm trying to slowly convert my colleagues to Linux :) Thanks for the qui...

...behaviour from the Windows redirector here. > > > > > > I have uploaded the Linux packet capture here (14MB): > https://drive.google.com/ > > open?id=0B6UHr3GQEkQwWXJ1NjVwMkJXOEU > > > > Also, here is the corresponding Windows packet capture as well > (375MB): https:/ > > /drive.google.com/open?id=0B6UHr3GQEkQwbFhOY0lCcEFjZkU > > to Windows :-). > > The Linux client is asking for SMB1 and using 1MB write sizes. > > The Windows client is using SMB2 and *NOT ASKING FOR LEASES*. > > This is why the performance is terrible. Be...

Hi all, In our office we use a program that makes many small writes to a file. We have been trying to use this program with our NAS, which hosts a Samba share on the network. However, the performance of the program is staggeringly slow on Window 7, 8.1, and 10. To make the problem easily repeatable, I created a small C++ program to just write 1 million lines to a file: