Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "36x".
Did you mean:
36
2012 Nov 30
13
Remove disk
Hi all,
I would like to knwon if with ZFS it''s possible to do something like that :
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/removeadisk.html
meaning :
I have a zpool with 48 disks with 4 raidz2 (12 disk). Inside those 48 disk
I''ve 36x 3T and 12 x 2T.
Can I buy new 12x4 To disk put in the server, add in the zpool, ask zpool
to migrate all data on those 12 old disk on the new and remove those old
disk ?
Regards.
--
Albert SHIH
DIO b?timent 15
Observatoire de Paris
5 Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon Cedex
T?l?phone : 01 45 07...
2011 Mar 31
0
[PATCH 7/7] x86: cleanup bogus CONFIG_ACPI_PCI uses
...),
- DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "PR-DLS"),
- DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VERSION,
- "ASUS PR-DLS ACPI BIOS Revision 1010"),
- DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_DATE, "03/21/2003")
- },
- },
- {
- .callback = disable_acpi_pci,
- .ident = "Acer TravelMate 36x Laptop",
- .matches = {
- DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Acer"),
- DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "TravelMate 360"),
- },
- },
{}
};
--- a/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/dmi_scan.c
@@ -229,27 +229,6 @@ static __init __attribute__((unused)) in...
2012 Mar 22
1
This old tune again : read performance optimisations
Hi list,
I have this problem of (relatively) poor samba read performance. Read
performance is constantly, reproducibly lower than write performance
and I can't really understand why.
Here is the server configuration :
dual octocore Opteron 6128, 32 GB RAM
Adaptec 6445 RAID card
36x 2TB Hitachi SATA drives (raid 60)
Sustained local disk throughput: over 850 MB/s write, over 1.4 GB/s
read.
kernel 3.1.10 (but I tried various versions with no more
success), amd64, pure vanilla kernel.org version.
Distro Debian squeeze amd64, samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze5
The client is an opter...
2004 Jul 02
0
1.0-test24 and some mbox benchmarking
...ritten 6MB less data. Also because Dovecot writes the file backwards,
it needs to do some extra jumping around and overlapping writes, but I
guess OS nicely merged them.
I'm not exactly sure why UW-IMAP uses so much CPU for rewriting, but it
does and so Dovecot is over 7x faster in total (with 36x less CPU).
Dovecot should also support delaying the rewrite. This is mostly useful for
POP3 clients which deletes all the mail at logout, so they won't need the
rewriting at all. Dovecot also writes all flag changes to disk immediately
while UW-IMAP leaves it later to do more at once. That res...