Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "36c".
Did you mean:
36
2013 May 31
1
Re: Fwd: Does Set Block IO tune take effect in the same session.
...ev vnet0
class htb 1:1 root leaf 2: prio 0 rate 80000bit ceil 80000bit burst 1600b cburst 1600b
Sent 5146972 bytes 3540 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 536752bit 45pps backlog 0b 4p requeues 0
lended: 359 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
tokens: -937499999 ctokens: -937499999
class sfq 2:36c parent 2:
(dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 103018b 4p requeues 0
allot 1520
We can see both rate and ceil being 80kbit however the current rate being 536kbit. I wonder what's going on and how to fix this.
> Regards,
> Vikrant
Michal
2015 Nov 21
2
Recent -Os code size regressions
..._run_test+0x3c9>
After
r252152:
Note that the OR $0x408 and OR $0x810 come
now
in reverse order.
35d: 81 c9 08 04 00 00 or $0x408,%ecx
363: 89 4c 24 28 mov %ecx,0x28(%esp)
367: 89 df mov %ebx,%edi
369: 83 e7 10
and $0x10,%edi
36c: 89 7c 24 20 mov %edi,0x20(%esp)
370: 0f 45 d1
cmovne %ecx,%edx
373: 89 d7 mov %edx,%edi
375: 81 cf 10 08 00 00 or $0x810,%edi
37b: 89 7c 24 14 mov %edi,0x14(%esp)
37f: 89 d9 mov %ebx,%ecx
381: 83 e1 20
...
2013 May 28
2
Re: Fwd: Does Set Block IO tune take effect in the same session.
On 27.05.2013 12:36, vikrant verma wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
> I am using the following code -
>
> virDomainSetInterfaceParameters(dom, "vnet0", networkParainfoPtr,
> nparams,0);
>
> before calling this i am assigning the following Inbound values
>
> inbound.average = 10 (10 kbps)
> inbound .peak = 10
> inbound.burst = 10
I suspect this way too
2007 Mar 02
2
rc25: need_space assert, core
Timo,
I see where at least one other person reported this, but here goes.
I went from rc24 to rc25 this morning, and I got an assert and core
from my own mailbox withing five minutes:
Mar 2 06:52:26 karst dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(jaearick): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 408: assertion failed: (need_space == (uoff_t)-mails[idx].space)
Mar 2 06:52:26 karst dovecot: [ID 107833
2015 Nov 21
3
Recent -Os code size regressions
Maybe adjust this to be different for –Os, -Oz than for –O2?
Kevin Smith
From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of James Molloy via llvm-dev
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 4:05 PM
To: Steve King <steve at metrokings.com>; Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Recent -Os code
2007 Apr 18
3
[Bridge] Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:05:59 +0000
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 08:50 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It's not really an oops, just a warning that stack space got quiet
> > tight.
> >
> > The problem seems to be that the br netfilter code is nesting far too
> > deeply and recursing several times. Looks like a design