Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "368ec319".
Did you mean:
368319
2013 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
On Oct 28, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> One thing I want to call out:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> I suppose what I'm saying is that we are currently not using *any* C++'11 features. It seems like conservatively great progress for LLVM 3.4 to bump the minimum GCC
2013 Oct 29
6
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
...so far!
(And I'll happily carry on discussing the meta issue of how C++11 should
look when used in LLVM, not trying to close that down.)
-Chandler
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131029/368ec319/attachment.html>
2013 Oct 28
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
One thing I want to call out:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> I suppose what I'm saying is that we are currently not using *any* C++'11
> features. It seems like conservatively great progress for LLVM 3.4 to bump
> the minimum GCC requirement up to enable use of VC 2010-era features (like
> rvalue refs and simple stdlib