search for: 368704

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0785 quagga security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0785.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/quagga-0.98.3-4.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/quagga-contrib-0.98.3-4.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm

...ttle free memory fairly soon. > > > > > > > I don't think so. > > Here's my laptop: > KiB Mem : 16048560 total, 8574956 free, 3360532 used, 4113072 buff/cache > > But here's a server: > KiB Mem: 32892768 total, 20092812 used, 12799956 free, 368704 buffers > > What is the difference? A ton of tiny daemons not doing anything, staying > resident in memory. > > > > > > I tend to think you can safely assume there's no free memory in > > > > > the guest, so there's little point optimizing for it....

...ttle free memory fairly soon. > > > > > > > I don't think so. > > Here's my laptop: > KiB Mem : 16048560 total, 8574956 free, 3360532 used, 4113072 buff/cache > > But here's a server: > KiB Mem: 32892768 total, 20092812 used, 12799956 free, 368704 buffers > > What is the difference? A ton of tiny daemons not doing anything, staying > resident in memory. > > > > > > I tend to think you can safely assume there's no free memory in > > > > > the guest, so there's little point optimizing for it....

...o > > you'll be left with very little free memory fairly soon. > > > > I don't think so. Here's my laptop: KiB Mem : 16048560 total, 8574956 free, 3360532 used, 4113072 buff/cache But here's a server: KiB Mem: 32892768 total, 20092812 used, 12799956 free, 368704 buffers What is the difference? A ton of tiny daemons not doing anything, staying resident in memory. > > > > I tend to think you can safely assume there's no free memory in the > > > > guest, so there's little point optimizing for it. > > > > > >...

> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration > optimization > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:08:44AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 01:52:53AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > > > I wonder if it would be possible to avoid the kernel changes > > > > > by parsing /proc/self/pagemap - if that

> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC qemu 0/4] A PV solution for live migration > optimization > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:08:44AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 01:52:53AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > > > I wonder if it would be possible to avoid the kernel changes > > > > > by parsing /proc/self/pagemap - if that

...> > > > > > > I don't think so. > > > > Here's my laptop: > > KiB Mem : 16048560 total, 8574956 free, 3360532 used, 4113072 buff/cache > > > > But here's a server: > > KiB Mem: 32892768 total, 20092812 used, 12799956 free, 368704 buffers > > > > What is the difference? A ton of tiny daemons not doing anything, staying > > resident in memory. > > > > > > > > I tend to think you can safely assume there's no free memory in > > > > > > the guest, so there's l...