search for: 36864

An EXT3 filesystem technically isn't supposed to require an fsck, correct? Well, as per my last email re: EXT3 Crash?! I ran an fsck on a couple of my LVMs. It said they were clean, but then I decided to be 100% sure and force an fsck. Error after Error after Error after Error. I wound up losing almost half the data on my LVM due to all the errors. What's the real deal? Am I doing

...r msgs when running with CVS wine: fixme:d3d:IWineD3DDeviceImpl_GetAvailableTextureMem (0x79180020) : stub, emulati ng 64MB for now, returning 64MB fixme:ddraw:IDirectDrawImpl_SetCooperativeLevel (0x7fd4ca30)->(0x10024,0000000a) fixme:dsound:DSOUND_MixOne problem with underrun detection (mixlen=36864 < prima ry_done=44160) fixme:dsound:DSOUND_MixOne problem with underrun detection (mixlen=36864 < prima ry_done=44160) fixme:dsound:DSOUND_MixOne problem with underrun detection (mixlen=36864 < prima ry_done=44160) fixme:dsound:DSOUND_MixOne problem with underrun detection (mixlen=36864 &l...

...y question to answer. I am trying to migrate data of of a samba server that is using winbind joined to a windows domain to another box. What samba or winbind files do I need so that this will resolve to names rather than UID and GID. For example........ drwxr-x--- 1049 10926 10005 36864 May 15 11:46 Student Thanks -- Bo Lynch

On 2/22/2017 10:40 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/22/2017 06:34 AM, Jason Welsh wrote: >> How does the directory *itself* have a size of 2.8 megs? > > > If you write a large number of directory entries in a directory, the > directory will grow in order to provide storage for those directory > entries. You can imagine a directory as a text file containing all of >

On 11/25/2013 04:12 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > I made some more and more experiments beyond LBA 65535 > > Works: * isolinux-4.07.bin (size 24574) * isolinux-5.00.bin (size > 34816) > > Does not work: * isolinux-5.01.bin (size 34816) * isolinux-5.10.bin > (size 36864) * isolinux-6.00.bin (size 38912) * isolinux-6.02.bin > (size 43008) > > * I just tested exactly at LBA 65535 (works all versions) and LBA > 65536 (fails all versions > 5.00). > What the heck... there are just about zero plausible differences between 5.00 and 5.01. I'm won...

...ss communication endpoint (writing to destination file takes place in another rsync process) 13:21:42.172254 open("/mnt/somedir/rsync-2.6.6.tar.gz", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3 ... 13:21:47.045818 read(3, "\37\213\10\0\3102\351B\0\3\354<ks\333\266\262\371j\375"..., 262144) = 36864 [rsync requested 262144 bytes, but got only 36864 bytes] ... 13:22:43.980934 write(4, "\37\213\10\0\3102\351B\0\3\354<ks\333\266\262\371j\375"..., 512) = 512 3:22:43.981111 gettimeofday({1127215363, 981132}, NULL) = 0 13:22:43.981325 select(5, NULL, [4], NULL, {60, 0}) = 1 (out [4], le...

Hello, I am working on the migration of our samba 3.5 domain controller (redhat 5.7) with ldap backend to samba 4.5 on a new server (debian 9.5). On the new server I transferred the smb.conf and all the contents of the /var/lib/samba folder to a temporary folder /root/samba3. To start the migration I use the command: # samba-tool domain samba3upgrade --dbdir =/root/samba3/ --realm =

...sam When user change password from windows XP file passdb.tdb schould change date because was updated, but I have still the same date IX 18 10:30. [root@serwer private]# ls -al razem 76 drwx------ 2 root root 4096 IX 11 20:25 . drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 XI 2 15:14 .. -rw------- 1 root root 36864 IX 25 07:57 passdb.tdb -rw------- 1 root root 8192 VII 24 07:57 schannel_store.tdb -rw------- 1 root root 8192 IX 18 10:30 secrets.tdb -rw------- 1 root root 7161 IX 19 15:28 smbpasswd user changed password 31 X 2007 08:08:16 but date of the passdb.tdb file is still the same (IX 18 2007 ). p...

...dhdurgee as expected. Is the passdb compatible between the two?  Can I simply copy the 3.6.25 version over the 4.3.11 one?  Shouldn't the passdb have been initialized properly when samba was installed?  Is there an initialization utility to run to do so? The 3.6.25 version of passdb.tdb is 36864 bytes while the 4.3.11 version is 421888 bytes respectively. Dave

...rwxr-x--- 7 amavis amavis 4096 Aug 21 19:10 . drwxr-xr-x. 15 root root 4096 Mar 15 2012 .. srwxr-x--- 1 amavis amavis 0 Aug 21 19:10 amavisd.sock srw-rw-rw- 1 amavis amavis 0 Aug 21 19:10 clamd.sock drwxr-x--- 2 amavis amavis 4096 Aug 21 19:10 db drwxr-x--- 2 amavis amavis 36864 Aug 21 19:50 quarantine drwxr-x--- 2 amavis amavis 4096 Aug 21 09:23 .razor drwx------ 2 amavis amavis 4096 Aug 21 20:42 .spamassassin drwxr-x--- 4 amavis amavis 4096 Aug 21 20:42 tmp Seems to be owned by the right group, I rebooted at 19.10 today hence timestamp date/time. So, my quest...

On 2/22/2017 12:27 PM, Anthony K wrote: > On my ext4 file system, I have a directory that has >2TB and the > directory entry itself only shows: > > $ ls -ld Stuff > drwxrwxr-x 146 akk akk 36864 Feb 21 21:18 Stuff/ > > $ du -bs Stuff > 2093651427987 Stuff ls -ld is showing the size of the actual directory, NOT the size of the files stored within and under it. du -s adds up the size on disk of all the stuff IN the directory. note also that size on disk even for a single fil...

...r drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 sept.  5 11:21 etc # ll /root/samba3/dbdir/ total 11900 -rw------- 1 root root    16384 août  17  2010 account_policy.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    53248 sept.  3 13:20 brlock.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   221184 sept.  3 15:45 connections.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    36864 sept.  5 11:35 gencache_notrans.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    49152 sept.  3 15:45 gencache.tdb -rw------- 1 root root    77824 oct.  17  2011 group_mapping.ldb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11005952 sept.  3 15:45 locking.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root      696 oct.  20  2010 login_cache.tdb -rw------- 1 roo...

...overflow - unable to expand buffer by 36 bytes. ndr_pull_error(11): ndr_pull_relative_ptr1 rel_offset(716800) > ndr- >data_size(4096) ndr_pull_security_descriptor failed: NDR_ERR_BUFSIZE prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 36 bytes. ~~ App. 400 lines cut ~~ ->data_size(36864) ndr_pull_security_descriptor failed: NDR_ERR_BUFSIZE prs_grow: Buffer overflow - unable to expand buffer by 36 bytes. read_block: invalid block header! regfio_rootkey: corrupt registry file ? No root key record located Could not get rootkey This happens on every NTUSER.DAT that I try, on ever...

...NTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using adding device /dev/sdc id 2 ... adding device /dev/sdy id 24 fs created label (null) on /dev/sdb nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 21.83TB Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 fsck.btrfs runs fine: # sudo fsck.btrfs /dev/sdb found 36864 bytes used err is 0 total csum bytes: 0 total tree bytes: 36864 total fs tree bytes: 4096 btree space waste bytes: 26174 file data blocks allocated: 0 referenced 0 Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 Now with one more disk: # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sd[b-z] WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see htt...

...Occasionally, when browsing new mail in INBOX, I get an error back from the imapd, displayed in Thunderbird as the following popup msg: The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: Error in IMAP command UID: Invalid BODY[..] parameter: Missing '>' in '<36864,-34800>'. >From this point, nothing much works reliably until I quit the MUA and start again. Sometimes, if I keep working, the email that was being fetched is shown but is corrupted and the msg body contains another copy of the whole email (header & body), sometimes 2 extra copies....

...ssdb compatible between the two?  Can I simply copy the >> 3.6.25 version over the 4.3.11 one?  Shouldn't the passdb have been >> initialized properly when samba was installed?  Is there an >> initialization utility to run to do so? The 3.6.25 version of >> passdb.tdb is 36864 bytes while the 4.3.11 version is 421888 bytes >> respectively. >> >> Dave > Welcome to the wonderful world of running Samba as a standalone > server ;-) > > You need to create your users and groups on the new server, both as > Unix & Samba users and groups, you...

On 11/25/2013 04:39 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >> Looks like there is something beyond LBA 65535 (As Mattias confirmed) > > I wanted to ask him now, whether this was already with > version 6. > But meanwhile he reported that it was 5. > > >> I can push isolinux.bin (4.07) to a really high LBA address and boot

...("/lib/libutil.so.0", O_RDONLY) = 4 fstat(4, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=4656, ...}) = 0 mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40007000 read(4, "\177ELF\1\1\1a\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0(\0\1\0\0\0008\10\0\000"..., 4096) = 4096 mmap2(NULL, 36864, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4012f000 mmap2(0x4012f000, 3160, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 4, 0) = 0x4012f000 mmap2(0x40137000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 4, 0) = 0x40137000 close(4) = 0 munmap(0x40007000, 40...

...egin: Running /scripts/local-premount ... Done. [ 2.886829] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds [ 2.886829] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Begin: Running /scripts/local-bottom ... Done. Done. Begin: Running /scripts/init-bottom ... o block READ from sector 367: 36864 Notify on address 0x4001000 Output to block READ from sector 439: 36864 Notify on address 0x4001000 Output to block READ from sector 511: 20480 Notify on address 0x4001000 Output to block READ from sector 8385727: 4096 Notify on address 0x4001000 Output to block READ from sector 8385927: 512 Notify...

...egin: Running /scripts/local-premount ... Done. [ 2.886829] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds [ 2.886829] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Begin: Running /scripts/local-bottom ... Done. Done. Begin: Running /scripts/init-bottom ... o block READ from sector 367: 36864 Notify on address 0x4001000 Output to block READ from sector 439: 36864 Notify on address 0x4001000 Output to block READ from sector 511: 20480 Notify on address 0x4001000 Output to block READ from sector 8385727: 4096 Notify on address 0x4001000 Output to block READ from sector 8385927: 512 Notify...