search for: 36527

...han without napi. >> >> 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: >> >> upstream: >> >> 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc >> 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> >> napi tx: >> >> 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc >> 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) >> 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc >> 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> >> This is a particularly strong example. It is also representative >> of most RR tests. It is less pronounced in other streaming tests. >> 10x TCP_RR, for instance: >> >...

...han without napi. >> >> 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: >> >> upstream: >> >> 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc >> 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> >> napi tx: >> >> 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc >> 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) >> 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc >> 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> >> This is a particularly strong example. It is also representative >> of most RR tests. It is less pronounced in other streaming tests. >> 10x TCP_RR, for instance: >> >...

...r the optimization is used. Though this is not limited to napi-tx, it is more pronounced in that mode than without napi. 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: upstream: 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc napi tx: 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc This is a particularly strong example. It is also representative of most RR tests. It is less pronounced in other streaming tests. 10x TCP_RR, for instance: upstream: 1,1,1: 42267 Mbps, 301 Gcyc 1,0,2: 40663 Mbps, 445 Gcy...

...r the optimization is used. Though this is not limited to napi-tx, it is more pronounced in that mode than without napi. 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: upstream: 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc napi tx: 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc This is a particularly strong example. It is also representative of most RR tests. It is less pronounced in other streaming tests. 10x TCP_RR, for instance: upstream: 1,1,1: 42267 Mbps, 301 Gcyc 1,0,2: 40663 Mbps, 445 Gcy...

...tx_irq}: >> >> >> >> upstream: >> >> >> >> 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc >> >> 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> >> >> >> napi tx: >> >> >> >> 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc >> >> 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) >> >> 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc >> >> 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> >> >> >> This is a particularly strong example. It is also representative >> >> of most RR tests. It is less pronounced in other streaming tests. &gt...

...tx_irq}: >> >> >> >> upstream: >> >> >> >> 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc >> >> 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> >> >> >> napi tx: >> >> >> >> 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc >> >> 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) >> >> 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc >> >> 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc >> >> >> >> This is a particularly strong example. It is also representative >> >> of most RR tests. It is less pronounced in other streaming tests. &gt...

...pi-tx, it is more > pronounced in that mode than without napi. > > 1x TCP_RR for affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: > > upstream: > > 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc > 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc > > napi tx: > > 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc > 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) > 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc > 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc > > This is a particularly strong example. It is also representative > of most RR tests. It is less pronounced in other streaming tests. > 10x TCP_RR, for instance: > > upstream: > > 1,1,1:...

...affinity configuration {process, rx_irq, tx_irq}: > >> > >> upstream: > >> > >> 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc > >> 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc > >> > >> napi tx: > >> > >> 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc > >> 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) > >> 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc > >> 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc > >> > >> This is a particularly strong example. It is also representative > >> of most RR tests. It is less pronounced in other streaming tests. > >> 10x TCP_R...

how is the stability of software raid1 on a system running centos3. i have 2 75gig hard drives that i would like to mirror if possible, that being the reliability is worth it...there will be lots of network traffic on the server. It will be used possibly as a file server, it will most definitely be used also as a mail server and webserver. i would be ok to me to not mirror the drives but this is

...;> upstream: > >> >> > >> >> 1,1,1: 28985 Mbps, 278 Gcyc > >> >> 1,0,2: 30067 Mbps, 402 Gcyc > >> >> > >> >> napi tx: > >> >> > >> >> 1,1,1: 34492 Mbps, 269 Gcyc > >> >> 1,0,2: 36527 Mbps, 537 Gcyc (!) > >> >> 1,0,1: 36269 Mbps, 394 Gcyc > >> >> 1,0,0: 34674 Mbps, 402 Gcyc > >> >> > >> >> This is a particularly strong example. It is also representative > >> >> of most RR tests. It is less pronounced in o...

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb at google.com> Convert virtio-net to a standard napi tx completion path. This enables better TCP pacing using TCP small queues and increases single stream throughput. The virtio-net driver currently cleans tx descriptors on transmission of new packets in ndo_start_xmit. Latency depends on new traffic, so is unbounded. To avoid deadlock when a socket reaches

...36400 valgrind shows several unitialized values in under crypt32/tests/message.c 36427 valgrind shows several leaks in dlls/taskschd/tests/scheduler.c 36450 EnumFontFamilies should report unsubstituted font names 36508 valgrind shows a couple invalid writes in kernel32/tests/change.c 36527 Multiple games and applications crash on unimplemented function KERNEL32.dll.AllocateUserPhysicalPages (Microsoft Office 2007 diagnosis service, Eden Eternal) 36607 valgrind shows two definite leaks in xmllite/tests/reader.c 37165 Sacred 2 Gold (v2.65.1) fails to start correctly, displays on...

Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know if there are any issues. I'll upload sources, docs, and your binaries to the pre-release website once they're ready. Thanks, Hans

...freebsd :: TestCases/vla_loop_overfow.cc (3071 of 36865) > FAIL: LLVM :: Bindings/Go/go.test (16654 of 36865) > FAIL llvm.org/llvm/bindings/go/llvm [build failed] > FAIL: lldb :: Expr/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test (36526 of 36865) > FAIL: lldb :: Expr/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test (36527 of 36865) > FAIL: lldb :: Expr/TestCallStopAndContinue.test (36528 of 36865) > FAIL: lldb-Unit :: Utility/./UtilityTests/TaskPoolTest.RunTasks (36865 of 36865) > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-Unit :: ./Asan-i386-inline-Test/AddressSanitizer.DoubleFreeTest (2514 of 36899) > FAIL: AddressSanitiz...