search for: 3632,6

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "3632,6".

Did you mean: 1632,6
2019 Jun 25
3
[PATCH libnbd] generator: Add Mutable type to the generator.
...Path n -> pr ", %s" n | SockAddrAndLen (n, _) -> pr ", /* XXX */ (void *) %s, 0" n @@ -3587,6 +3618,7 @@ let print_python_binding name { args; ret } = | Flags _ | Int _ | Int64 _ + | Mutable _ | Opaque _ | Path _ | SockAddrAndLen _ @@ -3632,6 +3664,7 @@ let print_python_binding name { args; ret } = | Flags _ -> () | Int _ -> () | Int64 _ -> () + | Mutable _ -> () | Opaque _ -> () | Path n -> pr " free (%s);\n" n | SockAddrAndLen _ -> () @@ -3730,6 +3763,7 @@ class NBD (o...
2011 May 11
8
[PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: map the node block when looking for readahead targets
If we have particularly full nodes, we could call btrfs_node_blockptr up to 32 times, which is 32 pairs of kmap/kunmap, which _sucks_. So go ahead and map the extent buffer while we look for readahead targets. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git
2012 Dec 13
22
[PATCH] Btrfs: fix a deadlock on chunk mutex
An user reported that he has hit an annoying deadlock while playing with ceph based on btrfs. Current updating device tree requires space from METADATA chunk, so we -may- need to do a recursive chunk allocation when adding/updating dev extent, that is where the deadlock comes from. If we use SYSTEM metadata to update device tree, we can avoid the recursive stuff. Reported-by: Jim Schutt