search for: 35s

I am trying to submit a package on CRAN, and everything passes ok on all platforms but Debian, where CRAN responds with an automatic "significant" warning: * checking whether package ?QCA? can be installed ... [35s/35s] WARNING Found the following significant warnings: /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string_fortified.h:106:10: warning: ?__builtin_strncpy? output may be truncated copying 12 bytes from a string of length 79 [-Wstringop-truncation] See ?/srv/hornik/tmp/CRAN/QCA.Rcheck/00install.out? for det...

Hi, R users, I have a problem about how to generate random sample interval from a duration. For example, during a time duration 0-70s, I want to generate a sample which last 10s. the sample could be 0-10 or 30-40s or 25-35s etc How could I do it in R`?? Thanks a lot. Tammy _________________________________________________________________ Share your memories online with anyone you want. http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/products/photos-share.aspx?tab=1 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ser comments section follows... ENCODER=opusenc from opus-tools 0.2-3-gf5f571b ENCODER_OPTIONS=--bitrate 56 --vbr --comp 5 ALBUM=Test-Sweeps ARTIST=Audacity COMMENT=60s logarithmic sweep (0-20kHz): 5s=10Hz, 10s=20Hz, 15s=39Hz, 20 s=78Hz, 25s=156Hz, 30s=312Hz, 35s=625Hz, 40s=1.25kHz, 45s=2.5kHz, 50s=5kHz, 55s= 10kHz, 60s=20kHz COMMENTS=60s logarithmisch DATE=2016 TITLE=Sweep (0-20kHz at 96kHz) log TRACKNUMBER=2 Opus stream 1: Pre-skip: 312 Playback gain: 0 dB Channels: 1 Original sample rate: 96...

Hi, Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster? Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things: 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging .obj files to deduplicate type infomation so we can do the linking on projects to generate something like a li...

...PM, Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at gmail.com> wrote: > > I am trying to submit a package on CRAN, and everything passes ok on all platforms but Debian, where CRAN responds with an automatic "significant" warning: > > * checking whether package ?QCA? can be installed ... [35s/35s] WARNING > Found the following significant warnings: > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string_fortified.h:106:10: warning: ?__builtin_strncpy? output may be truncated copying 12 bytes from a string of length 79 [-Wstringop-truncation] > See ?/srv/hornik/tmp/CRAN/QCA.Rcheck/00instal...

...e same with dm-backed storage as with other devices. Adjusting my small example, cd /tmp; truncate -s 10m g && loop=$(losetup --show -f g) echo 0 100 linear $loop 0 | dmsetup create zub dev=/dev/mapper/zub parted -s $dev \ mklabel gpt \ mkpart efi 34s 34s \ mkpart root 35s 35s \ mkpart roo2 36s 36s \ u s p blockdev --flushbufs $dev # FIXME: required with device-mapper-1.02.65-5 # write random bits to p1 dd of=${dev}p1 if=/dev/urandom count=1 dd if=${dev}p1 of=p1-copy.pre count=1 parted -s $dev mkpart p4 37s 37s blockdev --flushbufs $dev # FIXME:...

...riginal wav? I am not sure what Audacity means by a logarithmisch sweep. Is that a fixed number of Hertz per second (SoX calls that linear)? Or a fixed number of semitones per second (SoX calls that exponantional)? (The ogg comment says 5s=10Hz, 10s=20Hz, 15s=39Hz, 20s=78Hz, 25s=156Hz, 30s=312Hz, 35s=625Hz, 40s=1.25kHz, 45s=2.5kHz, 50s=5kHz, 55s=10kHz, 60s=20kHz so it seems the frequency rises logarithmically.) $ sox -c 1 -r 96k -b 16 -n /tmp/sweep.wav synth 60 sin create 1-20 gain -3 > With Opus I noticed that the file size for 48kHz and 48 kbps > compared to 96kHz Vorbis at 31kbps is...

...mon/Defines.common.mk with the attached files to make CC/LD customizable. in ./kmeans, for ./kmeans -m40 -n40 -t0.00001 -i inputs/random-n65536-d32-c16.txt -p 1 : make -f Makefile.seq clean CC='llvm-gcc' LD='llvm-gcc -lm' make -f Makefile.seq -->works, but is slower than gcc (35s vs 16s on my Intel 32b system) CC='llvm-gcc -emit-llvm' LD='llvm-ld -lm' make -f Makefile.seq --> does not work (lot's of NaN's in the output, and much faster (11s)) CC='llvm-gcc -emit-llvm' LD='llvm-ld -lm -disable-opt' make -f Makefile.seq --> does...

Leonardo, to answer to your questions, yes to all of them  You can take a look at this prototype/proposal: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55585 Overall, computing ghashes in parallel at link-time and merging Types with them is less costly that the current approach to merging. The 35sec you’re seeing for merging should go down to about 15sec. The patch doesn’t parallelize (yet) the Type merging itself, but we have an alternate multithread-suitable implementation of DenseHash which already supports lockless, wait-free, insert/fetch/resize. The prototype allows for testing differ...

...unch_dm: unable to add disk devices Second try: then I did changed disk param to- disk = [''access=w,vdev=xvda1,backend=storage,target=/root/domsi.img''] And I got this console log - [ 5.588091] XENBUS: Waiting for devices to initialise: 25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...235s...230s...225s...220s...215s...210s...205s...200s...195s...190s...185s...180s...175s...170s...165s...160s...155s...150s...145s...140s...135s...130s...125s...120s...115s...110s...105s...100s...95s...90s...85s...80s...75s...70s...65s...60s...55s...50s...45s...40s...35s...30s...25s...20s...15s...10s......

...unch_dm: unable to add disk devices Second try: then I did changed disk param to- disk = [''access=w,vdev=xvda1,backend=storage,target=/root/domsi.img''] And I got this console log - [ 5.588091] XENBUS: Waiting for devices to initialise: 25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...235s...230s...225s...220s...215s...210s...205s...200s...195s...190s...185s...180s...175s...170s...165s...160s...155s...150s...145s...140s...135s...130s...125s...120s...115s...110s...105s...100s...95s...90s...85s...80s...75s...70s...65s...60s...55s...50s...45s...40s...35s...30s...25s...20s...15s...10s......

...m>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Making LLD PDB generation faster More info inline, I think there is a couple of misconceptions on what I'm doing: 1) I already patch all my .obj files to contain .debug$H entries so it is all ghashed already 2) All the 35s is spent adding to the DenseMap Here is my current times (lld-link.exe compiled with -O2 so no lto/pgo), lld generates a 141 MB binary and 1.2GB pdb file: Input File Reading: 1724 ms ( 2.1%) Code Layout: 482 ms ( 0.6%) PDB Emission (Cumulative): 79261 ms ( 96.8%...

...condition has length > 1 and only the first element will be used". Here is str(data.2013) 'data.frame': 4293 obs. of 8 variables: $ rep : Factor w/ 4 levels "R1","R2","R3",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... $ construct: Factor w/ 10 levels "35S","46S","E1",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... $ time : int 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 ... $ treatment: Factor w/ 8 levels "Mock","MockUN",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 ... $ sample : int 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 ... $ signal : int 733750 665790 6595...

...riginal wav? I am not sure what Audacity means by a logarithmisch sweep. Is that a fixed number of Hertz per second (SoX calls that linear)? Or a fixed number of semitones per second (SoX calls that exponantional)? (The ogg comment says 5s=10Hz, 10s=20Hz, 15s=39Hz, 20s=78Hz, 25s=156Hz, 30s=312Hz, 35s=625Hz, 40s=1.25kHz, 45s=2.5kHz, 50s=5kHz, 55s=10kHz, 60s=20kHz so it seems the frequency rises logarithmically.) $ sox -c 1 -r 96k -b 16 -n /tmp/sweep.wav synth 60 sin create 1-20 gain -3 > With Opus I noticed that the file size for 48kHz and 48 kbps > compared to 96kHz Vorbis at 31kbps is...

...?a <dusa.adrian at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I am trying to submit a package on CRAN, and everything passes ok on all platforms but Debian, where CRAN responds with an automatic "significant" warning: >> >> * checking whether package ?QCA? can be installed ... [35s/35s] WARNING >> Found the following significant warnings: >> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string_fortified.h:106:10: warning: ?__builtin_strncpy? output may be truncated copying 12 bytes from a string of length 79 [-Wstringop-truncation] >> See ?/srv/hornik/tmp/CRAN/QCA.Rc...

...ualization platform. But the startup process hung with messages: xen-vbd: registered block device major 202 xvda:<6>netfront: Initialising virtual ethernet driver. XENBUS: Waiting for devices to initialise: 295s...290s...285s...280s...275s...270s...265s...260s...255s...250s...245s...240s...235s...230s...225s...220s...215s...210s...205s...200s...195s...190s...185s...180s...175s...170s...165s...160s...155s...150s...145s...140s...135s...130s...125s...120s...<6>Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver SCSI subsystem initialized st: Version 20080504, fixed bufsize 32768, s/g segs 256 BIOS EDD...

...lready running # if [ -f $LOCKFILE ] then MESSAGE='tried to start syncing when there already was on running' printf "%6s %6s %10s %55s \n" $STARTTIME $FILESYSTEM "$MESSAGE" >> $TIMELOG exit -3 else MESSAGE='started sync' printf "%6s %6s %10s %35s \n" $STARTTIME $FILESYSTEM "$MESSAGE" >> $TIMELOG # records start time touch $LOCKFILE fi # # This line does the actually syncing of the two file systems # #$WORKPATH/bin/rsync.5 --recursive \ $WORKPATH/bin/rsync.7 --recursive \ --progress \ --stats...

...> CC/LD > customizable. > > in ./kmeans, for > ./kmeans -m40 -n40 -t0.00001 -i inputs/random-n65536-d32-c16.txt -p > 1 : > > make -f Makefile.seq clean > > CC='llvm-gcc' LD='llvm-gcc -lm' make -f Makefile.seq > -->works, but is slower than gcc (35s vs 16s on my Intel 32b system) > > CC='llvm-gcc -emit-llvm' LD='llvm-ld -lm' make -f Makefile.seq > --> does not work (lot's of NaN's in the output, and much faster > (11s)) > > CC='llvm-gcc -emit-llvm' LD='llvm-ld -lm -disable-opt' mak...

...sts.llvm.org> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Making LLD PDB generation faster > > More info inline, I think there is a couple of misconceptions on what I'm doing: > > 1) I already patch all my .obj files to contain .debug$H entries so it > is all ghashed already > 2) All the 35s is spent adding to the DenseMap > > Here is my current times (lld-link.exe compiled with -O2 so no lto/pgo), lld generates a 141 MB binary and 1.2GB pdb file: > > Input File Reading: 1724 ms ( 2.1%) > Code Layout: 482 ms ( 0.6%) > PDB Emission (Cu...

...ensburg.de wrote: >> >> > Playing with Opus 1.3 I converted a tone sweep with a sample rate of 96kHz > >> > (just for fun). Before I had converted that from WAV to FLAC, and to Vorbis > >> > without problems. >> >> >> >> 30s=312Hz, 35s=625Hz, 40s=1.25kHz, 45s=2.5kHz, 50s=5kHz, 55s=10kHz, >> > 60s=20kHz >> >> so it seems the frequency rises logarithmically.) >> >> >> >> $ sox ‑c 1 ‑r 96k ‑b 16 ‑n /tmp/sweep.wav synth 60 sin create 1‑20 gain ‑3 >> >> >> >> >...