search for: 35kbps

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "35kbps".

Did you mean: 15kbps
2006 Jul 11
0
tcng not working as expected
Hi, Looking at the following sample, shouldn''t the client1_a be restricted to 35kBps even when there is 50kBps available. Please see the following configuration and suggest. What I wanted to do is I have clients grouped on VIP and Poor. The VIP clients and poor clients may be subscribed with the same bandwidth but I would like to prioritize the VIP clients. The VIP client will get...
2007 Jun 06
4
Best Codec
We are evaluating starting a small VoIP consumer based platform. What is the best codec to use with customers using primarily DSL as internet connectivity? I know that g729 is the king-all, but I want to know what the rest of the professional are using out there. g729 has a cost involved, so does the cost really offset the performance? Or is it better to go with g711 to start off? We plan
2007 Apr 23
4
SIP devices with packet loss tolerance
...particular providers or speeds, but in each case, the minimum was a 1mb/256k up ADSL. We asked the employees to run some speed tests to determine real-world speeds, and in each case upstream was around 220-235k (a little off the "official speed" but not bad). Certainly way more than the ~35kbps necessary for a g729 call, even with packet overheads. We've also tested the connections with a constant ping, and latency for nearly all of them is sub-35ms. So, that leads me towards packet loss as the only thing left. Generally speaking, these connections are giving between 1 and 4% packet...
2004 Aug 04
10
htb and fw problems
...lass). Any help will be appreciated here''s my htb conf #!/bin/bash tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 80 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 65kbps ceil 65kbps tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 20kbps ceil 35kbps prio 3 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 5kbps ceil 10kbps prio 0 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 8kbps ceil 11kbps prio 2 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:40 htb rate 23kbps ceil 40kbps prio 1 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:80 htb r...
2005 Mar 06
2
ogg
Hi: I am a new user of icecast, and I was wondering, wich source software, gives the option of compressing to low bitrates an ogg stream (lower than 48 kbps). Thanks: CC
2004 Jul 29
0
limiting outbound passive ftp
...UT iptables -t mangle -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 # shape the traffic to 35Kbytes tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 35kbps tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip handle 1 fw flowid 1:1 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2004 Aug 05
1
marking passive ftp and shaping
...UT iptables -t mangle -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 # shape the traffic to 35Kbytes tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 35kbps tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip handle 1 fw flowid 1:1 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2004 Aug 08
1
shaping ftp traffic
...UT iptables -t mangle -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 # shape the traffic to 35Kbytes tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 35kbps tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip handle 1 fw flowid 1:1 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2004 Aug 06
4
Optimizing speex for 44.1kHz
> The cost of down-sampling, if done efficiently, is probably less then > the cost difference between 32 kHz and 44.1 kHz so it's probably worth > it. If you don't care about standard sampling rate, you could even to a > 2/3 conversion which would get you 29.4 kHz... I'm curious why not just sample at a lower rate if it's just VoIP anyway? My opinion is that 44kHz