Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "35c37227".
2011 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
On Jul 28, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Talin wrote:
>> Because the stream is a raw_ostream, LLVM types and values can easily be printed to the stream without having to convert them to string form.
>
> I'm unconvinced that this is worth it at all. This is only going to allow you to "avoid going into the debugger" in the most trivial cases.
>
> Question - are you opposed to
2011 Jul 28
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2011, at 9:17 PM, Talin wrote:
>
> Here's an example of how this would be used: In the constructor for
> ConstantVector, there's an assert:
>
> assert(C->getType() == T->getElementType() &&
> "Initializer for vector element doesn't
2011 Jul 29
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
...nfortunately, "something went
wrong" is about all the information I typically get from an assertion
failure.
> -Chris
>
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110728/35c37227/attachment.html>