search for: 3555

Hi, I have 2 systems (A and B). I have an 800 number... when someone calls the 800 number it goes: IAX2-->A---IAX---B--->SIP PHONE However.. if the user calling the 800 number is a SIP user that is registered to A it goes: SIP--->A---IAX---B--->SIP PHONE This is the problem... when a call comes in from the IAX2 800 provider, things work fine... however if a SIP user registered to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3555 Bug ID: 3555 Summary: ForwardAgent doesn't work under Match canonical Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.4p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Com...

...esult() failed: Can't contact LDAP server dovecot: Apr 30 09:03:27 Error: auth(default): LDAP: ldap_result() failed: Can't contact LDAP server ... and so on ... When I turned on LDAP logging, this was what slapd logged. Apr 30 09:05:00 recess3 slapd[14387]: [ID 848112 local4.debug] conn=3555 fd=11 ACCEPT from IP=127.0.0.1:47299 (IP=0.0.0.0:389) Apr 30 09:05:00 recess3 slapd[14387]: [ID 215403 local4.debug] conn=3555 op=0 BIND dn="cn=root,o=home" method=128 Apr 30 09:05:00 recess3 slapd[14387]: [ID 600343 local4.debug] conn=3555 op=0 BIND dn="cn=root,o=home" mech=...

...Thierry ------ All is fine with f23/libvirt-1.2.18.3-2.fc23.x86_64 However with f24/libvirt-1.3.3.1-4.fc24.x86_64 my lxc containers won't start and I am seeing this message in the libvirtd logfile 2016-07-09 11:52:33.416+0000: 3479: debug : virCgroupValidateMachineGroup:317 : Name 'lxc-3555-inrisl1.libvirt-lxc' for controller 'cpu' does not match 'inri_sl1', 'lxc-3555-inrisl1', 'inri_sl1.libvirt-lxc', '\ machine-lxc\x2dinri_sl1.scope' or 'machine-lxc\x2d3555\x2dinrisl1.scope' 2016-07-09 11:52:33.416+0000: 3479: debug : virCgroupNewDe...

This patch fixes the problem with the undefined constants. Apologies to Alex as I didn''t apply his patches yet. The fix is to just removed the _C from the end of the ones that won''t compile anymore. Roy _______________________________________________ wxruby-users mailing list wxruby-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users

...using gatekeeper successfully. Now I have tried to Disable the gatekeeper in oh323.conf file gatekeeper=DISABLE Now I have tried to call, but the connection is not established. I have got following warning message in console. " WARNING[8446]: chan_oh323.c:3555 cleanup_h323_connection: Call 'ip$192.168.8.96:30005/27890-f5194af7' not found (clear). " Please any one give suggestions to disable the gatekeeper access in Asterisk... Thanks in Advance... Regards, Velusamy.K -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scru...

...ally I guess you could say that blank names, especially duplicates, are not kosher. But on the other hand, this combinatorial behaviour seems to occur only for blanks. -Frank PhD, Computational Biologist, Harvard Medical School BCMP/SGM-322, 250 Longwood Ave, Boston MA 02115, USA. Tel: 617-432-3555 Fax: 617-432-3557 http://llama.med.harvard.edu/~fgibbons

Hello. I've just tested my system that runs dovecot 2.3.4.1 on debian buster with testssl.sh (https://testssl.sh/) and is says: Secure Renegotiation (CVE-2009-3555) not vulnerable (OK) Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation VULNERABLE (NOT ok), potential DoS threat Is this a configuration or a compilation issue and how to solve it? -- sergio.

...9;'shutdown'': 0, ''VCPUs_live'': 1, ''PV_bootloader'': '''', ''actions_after_crash'': ''restart'', ''vbd_refs'': [''17605587-2a3d-9bf7-cfd9-0a73d7e790a9'', ''4ea50e6a-3555-017e-1a5f-4f0743a1a823''], ''PV_ramdisk'': ''/boot/initrd.img-2.6.26-2-xen-686'', ''is_control_domain'': False, ''name_label'': ''ezbox-mail'', ''VCPUs_at_startup'': 1, ''HVM_boot_params&...

...info. I've had a look in the places I could think of (plot.lm.R, termplot.R, plot.R, aov.R), and couldn't find anything. Maybe I overlooked it? Thanks -Frank Gibbons PhD, Computational Biologist, Harvard Medical School BCMP/SGM-322, 250 Longwood Ave, Boston MA 02115, USA. Tel: 617-432-3555 Fax: 617-432-3557 http://llama.med.harvard.edu/~fgibbons

...hought was spam. The last time I got one of these was a month or month and a half ago, and I had no problem. This time, however, I get a 500 error. When I pulled up firefox's error console, and clicked on the link, I got <servername elided>: server does not support RFC 5746, see CVE-2009-3555 I'm told they're running Cisco's IronPort. It appears the patch came out a year and a half or so ago. However, I also found a post where someone, apparently running on Windows, couldn't get to a site they needed to, either with IE 9 or FF10.somethingorother, until they downgraded....

...miliar with R/S-PLUS. Can anyone help me with this? I guess I'm really wondering how R is computing the constant term in its discriminant function. Thanks, -Frank Gibbons PhD, Computational Biologist, Harvard Medical School BCMP/SGM-322, 250 Longwood Ave, Boston MA 02115, USA. Tel: 617-432-3555 Fax: 617-432-3557 http://llama.med.harvard.edu/~fgibbons

...problem. I've scoured the web, and haven't been able to find any examples in which an add-on package function is called using the RSPerl module. Thanks, Frank Gibbons PhD, Computational Biologist, Harvard Medical School BCMP/SGM-322, 250 Longwood Ave, Boston MA 02115, USA. Tel: 617-432-3555 Fax: 617-432-3557 http://llama.med.harvard.edu/~fgibbons -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (i...

so i just found that one of my hosts is GENERATING these probe pairs, maybe every minute or two (note the sequence numbers): seq my host victim(s) --- ---------------- --------------- 24) 192.168.0.2:1121 <--> 216.52.3.2:2703 25) 192.168.0.2:1122 <--> 216.52.3.4:2703 39) 192.168.0.2:1124 <-->

...275 276 277 279 283 284 286 293 294 297 299 300 301 304 306 307 308 310 313 317 320 327 328 330 331 336 337 338 339 342 346 347 349 351 358 359 360 361 362 363 366 368 369 370 373 377 384 388 390 391 395 397 401 402 403 407 ... 3522 3523 3524 3525 3526 3527 3528 3529 3530 3537 3541 3545 3548 3554 3555 3558 3560 3561 3562 3563 3565 3570 3572 3576 3577 3581 3582 3583 3584 3585 3586 3587 3588 3589 3597 3600 3601 3603 3604 3606 3607 3610 3612 3613 3615 3616 3617 3618 3619 3620 3626 3627 3628 3632 3633 3635 3636 3642 3643 3646 3647 3648 3649 3651 3652 3653 3654 3655 3656 3657 3658 3659 3660 3669 3671...

..., which I wrote an importer for. Do people think an importer should check for all three types of tagging, or OggVorbis the way things are going here? Thank you for your help, please pardon me for my newness, Ankur - all hail the metamachine. http://www.overnet.com # 204 . 39 W14th St . 212-989-3555

How can I extract the linear discriminant functions resulting from a LDA analysis? The coefficients are listed as a result from the analysis but I have not found a way to extract these programmatically. No refrences in the archives were found. Thank you very much, Stefan

...Fraction.a 12423 13 18 2006 Fraction.a 15260 14 19 2006 Fraction.a 11126 15 20 2006 Fraction.a 9830 16 21 2006 Fraction.a 8460 17 22 2006 Fraction.a 6062 18 23 2006 Fraction.a 4382 19 24 2006 Fraction.a 3555 20 25 2006 Fraction.a 1792 21 26 2006 Fraction.a 2220 22 27 2006 Fraction.a 1235 23 28 2006 Fraction.a 465 24 29 2006 Fraction.a 0 25 30 2006 Fraction.a 59 and this is the barchart specifications, plot....

Hi I am trying to compile 5.5p1 for OS/2 ECS. But I am hitting an error on configure: configure:3484: checking whether byte ordering is bigendian configure:3517: gcc -c -D__EMX__ -DOS2 -D__ST_MT_ERRNO__ -O3 -mcpu=pentium3 co nftest.c >&5 configure:3523: $? = 0 configure:3555: gcc -c -D__EMX__ -DOS2 -D__ST_MT_ERRNO__ -O3 -mcpu=pentium3 co nftest.c >&5 conftest.c: In function `main': conftest.c:25: error: `not' undeclared (first use in this function) conftest.c:25: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once conftest.c:25: error: for each fu...

...Asterisk. When I called, it was worked fine. After then enabled the routing mode in gatekeeper.ini file then I restarted the gatekeeper. When I called the routing mode didn't work. I have received the following warning in Asterisk console. " Jul 21 14:19:11 WARNING[20199]: chan_oh323.c:3555 cleanup_h323_connection: Call 'ip$192.168.8.96:30005/32113-b632393e' not found (clear)." I am using the Asterisk 1.2.13 version. What would be the problem? Please any one give suggestions to execute the gatekeeper in routing mode... Thanks in Advance, Rega...