search for: 34s

...deed make parted behave the same with dm-backed storage as with other devices. Adjusting my small example, cd /tmp; truncate -s 10m g && loop=$(losetup --show -f g) echo 0 100 linear $loop 0 | dmsetup create zub dev=/dev/mapper/zub parted -s $dev \ mklabel gpt \ mkpart efi 34s 34s \ mkpart root 35s 35s \ mkpart roo2 36s 36s \ u s p blockdev --flushbufs $dev # FIXME: required with device-mapper-1.02.65-5 # write random bits to p1 dd of=${dev}p1 if=/dev/urandom count=1 dd if=${dev}p1 of=p1-copy.pre count=1 parted -s $dev mkpart p4 37s 37s blockdev...

Hey folks, I've been getting requests from the users that they want the OCFS2 filesystems aligned to 64k boundaries, however, when I began the project, the dummy of me, created the OCFS2 filesystem on top of the whole disk device (no partition) for example, one of the SAN devices would show up as /dev/dm-10, I created the filesystem using the following command: mkfs.ocfs2 -L SOMELABEL

...;s where I'm at now in case you're curious [root at host lib]# parted /dev/sdc unit s print free Model: SMC SMC2108 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdc: 8189439999s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 34s 8189439966s 8189439933s primary Information: Don't forget to update /etc/fstab, if necessary. [root at host lib]# cat /sys/bus/scsi/devices/0\:2\:2\:0/block\:sdc/size 8189440000 [root at host lib]# cat /sys/bus/scsi/devices/0\:2\:2\:0/block\:sdc/sdc1/size 7019519933 # I b...

LLVM-2.6 takes 3s from OCamlbuild, but the lastest LLVM (I am using r95712) takes 34s. I attached the code. But the new LLVM fixed a problem of dispose_module in 2.6. I got this error in 2.6, but the new LLVM works well. While deleting: [14 x i8]* %greeting An asserting value handle still pointed to this value! UNREACHABLE executed at /mnt/eclipse/acg/users/jianzhou/download/llvm-...

...b/l1/l1.root.ext4.dump.bz2 21168128 0% 6.72MB/s 0:56:31 28213248 0% 6.72MB/s 0:56:31 When I use FTP I get ~500MiB/s. `r/1/b/l1/l1.root.ext4.dump.bz2' at 4816830464 (20%) 483.43M/s eta:37s [Receivi `r/1/b/l1/l1.root.ext4.dump.bz2' at 5746065408 (24%) 494.15M/s eta:34s [Receivi 23362460206 bytes transferred in 46 seconds (487.76M/s) What is the bottleneck problem here? Why is it so slow? Other files (non-bzip2) do appear to transfer > 100-200MiB/s. Using rsync with rsh: rsync --exclude=/proc/* --exclude=/sys/* --archive --update --verbose --stats --progress...

...E6 is bad. Save the developers. Upgrade your browser. http://savethedevelopers.org Just my 2 cents. :) Kind regards, Sylvain Petreolle (aka Usurp) ----- Message d'origine ---- De : Wine Swine <wineswine at gmail.com> ? : wine-users at winehq.org Envoy? le : Jeudi, 10 Avril 2008, 4h49mn 34s Objet : Re: [Wine] Can't install IE6 Further to my last post - I already had wine set as "Windows 2000". On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 02:25 -0500, awdoyle wrote: > Hmm, odd. The error is the same. > On a fresh install of Kubuntu 8.04, WINE v 0.9.58, amd64 system. After I create...

v1 was here: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2022-October/030216.html Since then, I've incorporated changes based on Rich's feedback: swap order of patches 2 and 3 less change in patch 1 (including no unsafe eval(%s) for --uri) in patch 2, include -c in list of snippets to store, and use dict of lambdas to map back to the desired action Eric Blake (3): nbdsh:

Hello ! I am sure this has been posted before but I can not find it. I have used a file to check witch files a .inf file shall use. This util was very good to have when making a printers.def file. My problem is that I can not find the file anymore and I do not know the name of it. Thanks, /Mikael

...134207009s 133741125s primary lvm [root at lnxutil1 ~]# parted -s /dev/sdb unit s print Model: DELL PERC H700 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 5720768639s Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 34s 5720768606s 5720768573s lvm Can anyone confirm that the partitions are not aligned correctly, as I suspect? If this is true, is there any way to *quantify* the effects of partition mis-alignment on performance? In other words, what kind of improvement could I expect if I...

...[7038 B] Get:173 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main zfs-fuse amd64 0.6.9-1 [1389 kB] Get:174 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main libaio1 amd64 0.3.109-1 [8280 B] Get:175 http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main zlib1g amd64 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 [79.2 kB] Fetched 60.3 MB in 34s (1741 kB/s) febootstrap: aptitude: error: no file was downloaded corresponding to package binutils make[2]: *** [stamp-supermin] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/rjones/d/libguestfs/appliance' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rjones/d/libguestfs...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

This is an automatic message generated by the builder on builder-ubuntu for libguestfs. Log files from the build follow below. Linux builder-ubuntu 2.6.35-22-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 20:45:36 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Tue Feb 8 23:00:01 GMT 2011 ----- + git pull --rebase git://git.annexia.org/git/libguestfs.git master >From git://git.annexia.org/git/libguestfs * branch