search for: 34m

...m the client itself. It also appears that the duplicates does not have the size S= and vsize W= flags. Here is a short example of the last emails from my folder /.Sent/cur: -rw------- 1 pi pi? 1,6M mars? 24 22:18 1585084691.M834293P16489.raspberry-pi,S=1658182,W=1679758:2,S -rwx------ 1 pi pi?? 34M mars? 24 22:20 1585084841.M415421P17104Q0Rc311b18de2edf536.raspberry-pi:2, -rwx------ 1 pi pi?? 34M mars? 24 22:22 1585084954.M254398P17175Q0R6c5a66e22ac3a3d2.raspberry-pi:2, -rwx------ 1 pi pi?? 34M mars? 24 22:46 1585086411.M317404P18117Q0R61ba34fb281e8eb5.raspberry-pi:2, -rwx------ 1 pi pi??...

...ket_worker_runner 16:14:mblox_sender:94:/home/deploy/mbargo/lib/workers:/home/deploy/mbar 14141 deploy 15 0 20796 17m 1612 S 0.3 0.8 2:48.59 /usr/bin/ruby1.8 /usr/bin/packet_worker_runner 8:7:log_worker:17:/home/deploy/mbargo/lib/workers:/home/deploy/mbargo/s 14147 deploy 15 0 48232 34m 2556 S 0.3 1.7 5:10.90 /usr/bin/ruby1.8 /usr/bin/packet_worker_runner 11:10:master:4:/home/deploy/mbargo/lib/workers:/home/deploy/mbargo/scri 17523 deploy 17 0 132m 115m 3316 R 0.3 5.6 6:43.89 /usr/bin/ruby1.8 /usr/bin/packet_worker_runner 20:18:campaign_starter:39:/home/deploy/mbargo...

...s?????????????????????????????? 32G???? 0?? 32G?? 0% /dev/shm tmpfs?????????????????????????????? 32G?? 17M?? 32G?? 1% /run tmpfs?????????????????????????????? 32G???? 0?? 32G?? 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/md124????????????????????????? 59G? 1.6G?? 55G?? 3% /usr /dev/md153p2??????????????????????? 13T?? 34M?? 13T?? 1% /glusterfs/a4/b2 /dev/md151p1??????????????????????? 13T?? 34M?? 13T?? 1% /glusterfs/a2/b1 /dev/md151p2??????????????????????? 13T?? 34M?? 13T?? 1% /glusterfs/a2/b2 /dev/md152p1??????????????????????? 26T? 4.4T?? 22T? 17% /glusterfs/a3/b1 /dev/md122????????????????????????? 20G? 6.1G?? 1...

Hi. I was wanting to set up a centos 6 virtual machine using the netinst iso image. I've done this for Centos 5 before but I was surprised to see that the size of the netinst iso had gone from +/- 10Mb to 227Mb. I was therefore wondering if I had the right file? If so, why did it get 22x bigger then the previous version? Regards, Johan

...ear the top of "top" PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 4055 hardtolo 20 0 2165m 945m 49m R 95.9 12.0 3724:26 firefox 3119 root 20 0 276m 121m 34m S 34.0 1.6 2228:58 Xorg 15645 hardtolo 20 0 6163m 350m 26m S 10.6 4.5 181:50.51 java 5663 hardtolo 20 0 1557m 202m 24m S 9.6 2.6 294:53.69 plugin-containe...

...tting up a glusterfs server apir with replication and am testing performance. While doing that we stumbled over that in top: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 5151 root 20 0 6184m 5.9g 2540 R 200 9.3 28:27.99 glusterfs 5618 root 20 0 392m 34m 2116 S 38 0.1 24:53.10 glusterfsd When under heavy load, CPU usage will not exceed 200% hence I'm assuming it only spawns two threads. Can that be tweaked? My hope is that when that is increased and glusterfs can use more cpus, the overall performance will increase drastically. Thanks...

.../mapper/VG00-LV00 2.0G 695M 1.2G 37% / /dev/hda1 494M 25M 444M 6% /boot none 1013M 0 1013M 0% /dev/shm /dev/mapper/VG00-LV04 9.9G 5.4G 4.0G 58% /home /dev/mapper/VG00-LV05 1008M 34M 924M 4% /opt /dev/mapper/VG00-LV03 4.0G 41M 3.7G 2% /tmp /dev/mapper/VG00-LV01 7.9G 4.2G 3.4G 56% /usr /dev/mapper/VG00-LV02 4.0G 929M 2.9G 25% /var Thanks in advance for any help with this.... Bob

...D USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2921 root 16 0 227m 69m 7312 R 20.9 15.9 22:55.56 X 3100 finley 15 0 183m 51m 16m S 0.4 11.7 5:05.54 firefox-bin 3116 finley 15 0 223m 39m 2440 S 0.4 8.9 0:54.60 java_vm 3253 finley 15 0 198m 34m 9.8m S 0.0 7.9 0:07.97 swriter.bin 3317 finley 15 0 240m 25m 8684 S 2.9 5.8 2:35.17 xine 3399 finley 15 0 57024 25m 16m S 0.0 5.7 0:08.57 konqueror 3638 finley 15 0 93632 23m 15m S 0.0 5.4 0:03.80 gaim 3026 finley 15 0 35180 13m 10m S 0.0 3.1 0:05...

I couldn''t find anyone who had actually made it work via google so I guess I''ll ask here. My setup is a VPN point to point link. The VPN is a modified version of Openvpn where I''m using zlib compression to improve the compression a bit. The goal is to shape traffic coming from a routing server through the vpn to the endpoint of the vpn and in such a way maximize the

...> > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ > COMMAND > 4055 hardtolo 20 0 2165m 945m 49m R 95.9 12.0 3724:26 > firefox > 3119 root 20 0 276m 121m 34m S 34.0 1.6 2228:58 > Xorg > 15645 hardtolo 20 0 6163m 350m 26m S 10.6 4.5 181:50.51 > java > 5663 hardtolo 20 0 1557m 202m 24m S 9.6 2.6 294:53.69 > plugin-containe...

...110m 3508 S 0 10.8 0:52.87 mongrel_rails 10971 raghus 15 0 188m 107m 3440 S 0 10.5 0:50.61 mongrel_rails 11013 raghus 15 0 179m 103m 3348 S 0 10.1 0:45.18 mongrel_rails * 7084 raghus 15 0 152m 73m 2036 S 11 7.2 116:31.68 packet_worker_r* 11129 raghus 15 0 134m 58m 3336 S 0 5.7 0:05.20 mongrel_rails * 7085 raghus 15 0 131m 53m 2020 S 0 5.2 2:23.61 packet_worker_r* 5094 mysql 15 0 215m 38m 3272 S 0 3.7 44:13.99 mysqld * 7083 raghus 15 0 97.9m 36m 1192 S 0 3.5 2:28.98 packet_worker_r* 7081 raghus 15 0 98.3...

I am running a fairly new box, Athlon 1.4Ghz, 512 Mb RAM, RedHat 7.3, rsync rsync version 2.5.4 protocol version 26, it's disk layout is; bash-2.05a# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda6 372M 338M 15M 96% / /dev/sda1 45M 8.9M 34M 21% /boot /dev/sda5 703M 218M 449M 33% /home none 251M 0 251M 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda2 1.9G 1.7G 101M 95% /usr /dev/sda7 251M 130M 107M 55% /var /dev/hda1 19G 2.3G 16G 13% /usr/local/backup /dev/hda2 17...

...i:~]$ ssh server pwd No value for $TERM and no -T specified/home/scarolan No value for $TERM and no -T specified **************************************** Anyone know why this is happening? Here's the contents of my .bashrc: **************************************** # .bashrc PS1="[\[\e[34m\]\u\[\e[0m\]@\[\e[32m\]\h:\w\[\e[0m\]]\$ \[\e[0m\]" # Source global definitions if [ -f /etc/bashrc ]; then . /etc/bashrc fi ****************************************

...s/method/locuszoom-credible-sets.pdf. > > I agree many feel geneticists go to far with small p values which I would have difficulty to argue againston the other hand it is also expected to see these in a non-genetic context. For instance the Framingham study was established in 1948 just got $34m for six years on phenotypewide association which we would be interesting to see. > > Best wishes, > > > Jing Hua > > > ________________________________ > From: peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> > Sent: 21 June 2019 16:24 > To: jing hua zhao > Cc: Ru...

...is (according to the stuff painted on the mobo itself) Super X7DBI+, Intel Xeon L5420 with 8 cores total, 3ware 9650SE using the driver from the manufacturer's site. I tested 2 disks in a mirror RAID volume. Results: kernel time speed ====== ==== ===== patched 75min 23M/s original 51min 34M/s patched 48min 36M/s original 61min 28M/s -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

...928 668 d0 D 4:34PM 0:00.00 /usr/bin/as -o comconsole.o - last pid: 1252; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 0+02:37:22 19:04:48 64 processes: 1 running, 63 sleeping CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle Mem: 34M Active, 23M Inact, 38M Wired, 204K Cache, 22M Buf, 906M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free devel# vmstat procs memory page disks faults cpu r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr ad0 da0 in sy cs us sy id 1 7 0 144612 928056 16 0 0 0...

Hello, Jon > To make it easier to use the LLVM-GCC MinGW32 binary and meet your GPL licensing requirements, could you embed the MinGW binutils binary as-is in the LLVM-GCC MinGW32 and update the LLVM docs to point to the MinGW SourceForge download site for those wanting the MinGW binutils source? I still don't think it's good idea. binutils will add something like 10Mb to package

Hello, I have two Vmware images, with 256MB of RAM memory each one, running puppetmasterd for the server and puppetd for the client. It''s normal that my puppetmasterd and puppetd occupies almost 10% of RAM memory each one? They aren''t doing anything especial, just listening on the ports. Thanks.

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

You may want to look into using the log option to qnorm e.g., in round figures: > log(1e-300) [1] -690.7755 > qnorm(-691, log=TRUE) [1] -37.05315 > exp(37^2/2) [1] 1.881797e+297 > exp(-37^2/2) [1] 5.314068e-298 Notice that floating point representation cuts out at 1e+/-308 or so. If you want to go outside that range, you may need explicit manipulation of the log values. qnorm()