search for: 34944

Using Gentoo with kernel 2.6.1 and 2.6.3 and Samba 2.2.8a and 3.0.2a. Mostly when I transfer large (100+MB) files from a WinXP machine to the Samba server I get the following error: [smbd] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(342)_ [smbd] read_socket_data: recv failure for 34944. Error = Connection reset by peer_ The WinXP machines also say "Delayed write failed. The data has been lost". What can be the problem and where do I start to look to solve it? ~S

Please, Where can I find a list of repositories all over internet.. I want to keep my CentOS servers up 2 date with mailscanner, clamAV, syslog-ng, and others... I know dag has a very goog one but there are some paktes I can not find in dag repository like mailscanner, syslog-ng, among others... Sorry if it's offtopic but I need it! Thanks in advance Regards, israel

As most Wine users probably know, running applications using Wine won't (in most cases) give you the same performance as running the application in native Windows. From my experience this is especially true when it comes to applications that make use of Direct3D, and I suppose the performance drop is (at least in part) due to the translation of Direct3D to OpenGL in Wine. Now, this got me

Hi, I updated from 0.9.17 to 0.9.18 using Suse 9.1 rpm. Now, all wine applications crash. Even winecfg crashes. Does nayone else have this problem? Osho

...rec = 0x0 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "maildir_uidlist_records_drop_expunges" #7 maildir_uidlist_recreate (uidlist=0x9e7ec18) at maildir-uidlist.c:1274 control_dir = <value optimized out> temp_path = <value optimized out> st = {st_dev = 4, __pad1 = 34944, __st_ino = 0, st_mode = 3218056160, st_nlink = 166312736, st_uid = 36, st_gid = 166307928, st_rdev = 13252593345643914360, __pad2 = 45756, st_size = 17179869190, st_blksize = 134776960, st_blocks = 714305322486857728, st_atim = {tv_sec = -1076910920,...

...087354 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 LDAP 73 unbindRequest(5) 18 0.087401 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40258→389 [FIN, ACK] Seq=1964 Ack=880 Win=9056 Len=0 TSval=121084520 TSecr=361924305 19 0.087467 10.5.1.25 -> 10.5.1.202 TCP 66 389→40258 [FIN, ACK] Seq=880 Ack=1965 Win=34944 Len=0 TSval=361924306 TSecr=121084520 20 0.087621 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40258→389 [ACK] Seq=1965 Ack=881 Win=9056 Len=0 TSval=121084520 TSecr=361924306 and last configuration work. So seems that the only option compatible with that MFP is the less secure 'ldap server requir...

...087354 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 LDAP 73 unbindRequest(5) 18 0.087401 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40258→389 [FIN, ACK] Seq=1964 Ack=880 Win=9056 Len=0 TSval=121084520 TSecr=361924305 19 0.087467 10.5.1.25 -> 10.5.1.202 TCP 66 389→40258 [FIN, ACK] Seq=880 Ack=1965 Win=34944 Len=0 TSval=361924306 TSecr=121084520 20 0.087621 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40258→389 [ACK] Seq=1965 Ack=881 Win=9056 Len=0 TSval=121084520 TSecr=361924306 and clearly this is an example of SASL over PLAIN LDAP, no TLS nor SSL, because i can ''see'' the query (if it...

...0.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 LDAP 73 unbindRequest(5) > 18 0.087401 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40258→389 [FIN, ACK] Seq=1964 Ack=880 Win=9056 Len=0 TSval=121084520 TSecr=361924305 > 19 0.087467 10.5.1.25 -> 10.5.1.202 TCP 66 389→40258 [FIN, ACK] Seq=880 Ack=1965 Win=34944 Len=0 TSval=361924306 TSecr=121084520 > 20 0.087621 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40258→389 [ACK] Seq=1965 Ack=881 Win=9056 Len=0 TSval=121084520 TSecr=361924306 > > and last configuration work. So seems that the only option compatible > with that MFP is the less secure ...

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > There's some way to ''tight'' that configuration , eg permit 'ldap server require strong auth = > > no' only by some hosts? > > Or some other smb.conf options that i've missed? > Nothing at this stage. Ok. > The issue is that they need to do fully signed or sealed Kerberos

...-> 10.5.1.25 LDAP 73 unbindRequest(5) >> 18 0.087401 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40258???389 [FIN, ACK] Seq=1964 Ack=880 Win=9056 Len=0 TSval=121084520 TSecr=361924305 >> 19 0.087467 10.5.1.25 -> 10.5.1.202 TCP 66 389???40258 [FIN, ACK] Seq=880 Ack=1965 Win=34944 Len=0 TSval=361924306 TSecr=121084520 >> 20 0.087621 10.5.1.202 -> 10.5.1.25 TCP 66 40258???389 [ACK] Seq=1965 Ack=881 Win=9056 Len=0 TSval=121084520 TSecr=361924306 >> >> and last configuration work. So seems that the only option compatible >> with that MFP is th...

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > This mean that the printer try to auth in LDAP 'plain' (no SSL, no > > TLS), and so samba refuse that? > No, it means that Samba is refusing to accept a NTLM or Kerberos > authenticated connection without SIGN or SEAL negotiated, as an > attacker could take over an unprotected network connection and do

...cess.c:process_smb(1091) Transaction 244 of length 43 [2006/01/19 11:16:54, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(464) [2006/01/19 11:16:54, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(474) size=39 smb_com=0x74 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=51207 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=160 smb_mid=34944 smt_wct=2 smb_vwv[ 0]= 255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[ 1]= 0 (0x0) smb_bcc=0 [2006/01/19 11:16:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(886) switch message SMBulogoffX (pid 7866) conn 0x0 [2006/01/19 11:16:54, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2006/0...

...hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes) [ 37.308833] TCP bind hash table entries: 65536 (order: 7, 524288 bytes) [ 37.315444] TCP: Hash tables configured (established 131072 bind 65536) [ 37.322024] TCP reno registered [ 37.325291] initcall inet_init+0x0/0x1c5 returned 0 after 34944 usecs [ 37.331765] calling af_unix_init+0x0/0x41 @ 1 [ 37.336271] NET: Registered protocol family 1 [ 37.340696] initcall af_unix_init+0x0/0x41 returned 0 after 4321 usecs [ 37.347277] calling pci_apply_final_quirks+0x0/0x28 @ 1 [ 37.366763] pci 0000:07:03.0: Boot video device [ 37.37...