Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "34729".
Did you mean:
4729
2006 Feb 16
4
FTP Server and IPTables?
...##################################
Lastly, here's a typical log rejection notice from /var/log/messages
Feb 15 19:23:32 atreyu kernel: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=00:e0:81:2f:7c:22:00:b0:c2:88:9d:4d:08:00 SRC=$MYHOUSEIP DST=$SERVERIP
LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=51 ID=20932 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=32877 DPT=34729
WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
What am I missing?
-Ben
--
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."
- XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978
2007 Jan 08
11
NFS and ZFS, a fine combination
Just posted:
http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/nfs_and_zfs_a_fine
____________________________________________________________________________________
Performance, Availability & Architecture Engineering
Roch Bourbonnais Sun Microsystems, Icnc-Grenoble
Senior Performance Analyst 180, Avenue De L''Europe, 38330,
Montbonnot Saint
2013 Dec 23
2
[PATCH net-next 3/3] net: auto-tune mergeable rx buffer size for improved performance
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote:
> Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag
> allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to
> MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large
> average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all
>
2013 Dec 23
2
[PATCH net-next 3/3] net: auto-tune mergeable rx buffer size for improved performance
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote:
> Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag
> allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to
> MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large
> average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all
>