search for: 34561e69

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "34561e69".

2012 Nov 27
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] Removal of 'deplibs'?
Please nuke it. It is really old and was never used. If it comes back it should be done with module metadata. -Chris On Nov 26, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Did you know that there is a 'deplibs' keyword? Neither did I. It looks like it's not really used for much. We don't document it in the Language Reference.
2012 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] Removal of 'deplibs'?
...> LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121128/34561e69/attachment.html>
2012 Nov 27
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Removal of 'deplibs'?
Hi all, Did you know that there is a 'deplibs' keyword? Neither did I. It looks like it's not really used for much. We don't document it in the Language Reference. The only support I see if for reading/writing bitcode and manipulating modules. There's a bunch of code that could be removed if we could get rid of this. Does anyone use this thing? Does anyone mind if I nuke it?