Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "3400hz".
Did you mean:
a400hz
2005 Apr 06
3
Standard encoding rates?
...tp://users.hfx.eastlink.ca/~amstereo/amstereo.htm>
for more information.
> Telephone is nominally 8 kHz mono
> (i.e. really bad) though I think the use of digital voice codecs in the
> last 20 years may have improved on this a bit.
Telephone lines (POTS) have a frequency range of 300-3400Hz. That
means 7kHz mono should be enough, although 8kHz is generous towards
the transition bandwidth/roll-off.
- Andrew
2005 Apr 06
0
Standard encoding rates?
[ > Telephone is nominally 8 kHz mono (i.e. really bad) though I
[ > think the use of digital voice codecs in the last 20 years may
[ > have improved on this a bit.
[
[ Telephone lines (POTS) have a frequency range of 300-3400Hz. That
[ means 7kHz mono should be enough, although 8kHz is generous towards
[ the transition bandwidth/roll-off.
7 kHz would require a tighter brick-wall filter than even CD, are you even
sure it's possible to go from flat to silent in 100 Hz (between 3400 Hz and
3500 Hz)?
Almost all te...
2005 Apr 05
5
Standard encoding rates?
Is there a list somewhere of "standard" encoding rates? I know, for example,
CDs are encoded at 44100, as is a lot of digital sound, but I've seen
programs that specify different levels of quality (like radio, phone, tape,
CD) and I'd like to know if there are some encoding rates that are accepted
as standardized for recording at different levels of quality.
If so, is there