search for: 33e6bab3

Hi Renato, > The test is initializing srand(1), so in theory, it shouldn't be different > between compilers, since Clang is using the same libraries. If Clang and GCC disagree on the same source, same machine and with the same libraries, that certainly is odd. But it doesn't make checking against the output of a particular libc's RNG any better an idea in general. Cheers.

On 12 March 2013 14:24, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Could be worth a try. But if that thing really is generating random > numbers I'm not sure replacing one genuine cast-iron random number > with another is the best solution long-term. > The test is initializing srand(1), so in theory, it shouldn't be different between compilers, since Clang is