search for: 33964

...3427.020489 10.0.31.235 -> 10.0.10.0 TCP 66 33963 > ldap [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=14624 Len=0 TSval=537106777 TSecr=0 3427.020562 10.0.31.235 -> 10.0.10.0 LDAP 122 bindRequest(1) "CN=stampa,CN=Users,DC=galliera,DC=it" simple 3427.021894 10.0.31.235 -> 10.0.10.0 TCP 74 33964 > ldap [SYN] Seq=0 Win=14600 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=537106778 TSecr=0 WS=32 3427.022474 10.0.10.0 -> 10.0.31.235 LDAP 88 bindResponse(1) success 3427.022498 10.0.31.235 -> 10.0.10.0 TCP 66 33963 > ldap [ACK] Seq=57 Ack=23 Win=14624 Len=0 TSval=537106778 TSecr=33551087...

Can I maintain an RH3 system using centos packages? I admin a non-profit's server and got them RH3 but the subscription has expired. I would rather not reload the os, rather just update it using centos and yum. I haven't worked with yum much, how do I configure it? TIA Chuck *********************************************************************************** This transmittal may contain

...rator Tag = 21, Count = 354166, Ops = 2833328, Name = DW_TAG_subroutine_type Tag = 2, Count = 77999, Ops = 623992, Name = DW_TAG_class_type Tag = 47, Count = 27122, Ops = 108488, Name = DW_TAG_template_type_parameter Tag = 28, Count = 8491, Ops = 33964, Name = DW_TAG_inheritance Tag = 66, Count = 10930, Ops = 43720, Name = DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type Tag = 16, Count = 54680, Ops = 218720, Name = DW_TAG_reference_type Tag = 23, Count = 624, Ops = 4992, Name = DW_TAG_union_type Tag = 4, Count =...

Hi everyone, I'm trying to use Opus in an Embedded Project which I'm developing in a STM32F429IIT6 microcontroller. Currently, I'm playing wav files in it. I ported all the files from OpusLib 1.1.4 needed to compile the project, but when I try to create and OpusDecode state, it returns the error -7 (OPUS_ALLOC_FAIL). I'm compiling it with the USE_ALLOCA flag. I also tried to

In r219010, I merged integer and string fields into a single header field. By reducing the number of metadata operands used in debug info, this saved 2.2GB on an `llvm-lto` bootstrap. I've done some profiling of DW_TAGs to see what parts of PR17891 and PR17892 to tackle next, and I've concluded that they will be insufficient. Instead, I'd like to implement a more aggressive plan,

...32 663, i32 0, { }* bitcast (%llvm.dbg.compile_unit.type* @llvm.dbg.compile_unit134216 to { }*)) [33962] File Name: [14 x i8] c"sql_insert.cc\00, LineNo: 667, Inst: call void @llvm.dbg.stoppoint(i32 667, i32 0, { }* bitcast (%llvm.dbg.compile_unit.type* @llvm.dbg.compile_unit134216 to { }*)) [33964] File Name: [14 x i8] c"sql_insert.cc\00, LineNo: 660, Inst: call void @llvm.dbg.stoppoint(i32 660, i32 0, { }* bitcast (%llvm.dbg.compile_unit.type* @llvm.dbg.compile_unit134216 to { }*)) [33965] File Name: [14 x i8] c"sql_insert.cc\00, LineNo: 588, Inst: call void @llvm.dbg.stoppoint(...