search for: 336335

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "336335".

Did you mean: 33635
2006 Oct 24
4
avoiding a loop
I think I asked a similar question 3 years ago to the Splus list and I think the answer was no or noone answered so noone should spend more than 5 minutes on this because it could definitely be a waste of time. My question is whether the function below can be rewritten without a for loop. apply is fine if it can be done that way but i doubt it. I call it a lot and would prefer to not loop.