Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "336335".
Did you mean:
33635
2006 Oct 24
4
avoiding a loop
I think I asked a similar question 3 years ago to the Splus list and I
think the answer was no or noone answered so noone should spend more
than 5 minutes on this
because it could definitely be a waste of time.
My question is whether the function below can be rewritten without a for
loop. apply is fine if it can be done that way but i doubt it. I call it
a lot and would
prefer to not loop.