search for: 3362dcd9

...auto-hiding, then? It could do the check of, are all declarations marked local_unnamed_addr, if so, make it weak_odr + unnamed_addr + visibility=hidden? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180207/3362dcd9/attachment.html>

> From looking at the code, it seems like LLVM is basically opting MachO into -fvisibility-inlines-hidden all the time, i.e. if the function is linkonce, it's discardable, so mark it hidden to pretend the compiler inlined it and discarded it. However, this isn't conforming, because the addresses of inline functions will no longer compare equal across DSOs. I think there is a nuance, it