search for: 332f

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "332f".

Did you mean: 332
2018 Aug 14
3
GCC 5 and -Wstrict-aliasing in JSON.h
...ion, why not simply take the union member of the appropriate type? I don't think that GCC would produce this warning unnecessarily. You are in dangerous waters. -- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
2018 Aug 10
4
GCC 5 and -Wstrict-aliasing in JSON.h
在 2018-08-10 06:20, Kim Gräsman 写道: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:02 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> If GCC 4.9.3 thinks there's an aliasing violation it might >> misoptimise. It doesn't matter if it's right or not, it matters if it >> treats the code as undefined or not. >> >> And apparently GCC does think
2018 Aug 10
2
GCC 5 and -Wstrict-aliasing in JSON.h
...t > stored in the memory at that address was stored as the union type. > > Do not lie to the compiler or it will get its revenge. > > -- > Andrew Haley > Java Platform Lead Engineer > Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com> > EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180810/ba826ae9/attachment.html>
2018 Aug 12
4
GCC 5 and -Wstrict-aliasing in JSON.h
I did some more extensive testing and found that all GCCs older than 7 trigger the warning, but only if CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release (which I guess indicates optimizations are enabled). There's a patch up for disabling the warning here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50607. I still feel a little uncomfortable, because I think Jonathan makes an excellent point -- if GCC thinks there's a
2018 Jan 22
3
What does this mean? select(1, [0], , NULL, {60, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
..., 943902}) 10137 00:55:41 read(0, "\374\17\0\7", 4) = 4 10137 00:55:41 select(1, [0], [], NULL, {60, 0}) = 1 (in [0], left {59, 999997}) 10137 00:55:41 read(0, "\25\\\223R\233\263\355wW\23\203;4\212\214\331>\212\251\333=e\237\"\307r \313\34\273M\275Y\10\242\367\273\7\2679P\332F\312q\240eL)\356\204\17\203 k\375}\306\331\256\357\20B\326kP\236\240\10\222c\303\261k\7\220\2040\26l 6X\343\2\234i\275\244\243\300\222\302\177\245(fN\270\323\376\331Y"..., 4092) = 4092 10137 00:55:41 select(1, [0], [], NULL, {60, 0}) = 1 (in [0], left {59, 990075}) 10137 00:55:41 read(0, &quo...
2018 Jan 22
0
What does this mean? select(1, [0], , NULL, {60, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
...1 read(0, "\374\17\0\7", 4) = 4 > 10137 00:55:41 select(1, [0], [], NULL, {60, 0}) = 1 (in [0], left {59, > 999997}) > 10137 00:55:41 read(0, > "\25\\\223R\233\263\355wW\23\203;4\212\214\331>\212\251\333=e\237\"\307r > \313\34\273M\275Y\10\242\367\273\7\2679P\332F\312q\240eL)\356\204\17\203 > k\375}\306\331\256\357\20B\326kP\236\240\10\222c\303\261k\7\220\2040\26l > 6X\343\2\234i\275\244\243\300\222\302\177\245(fN\270\323\376\331Y"..., > 4092) = 4092 > 10137 00:55:41 select(1, [0], [], NULL, {60, 0}) = 1 (in [0], left {59, > 990075}) &g...
2016 Nov 21
2
Winbind traffic not encrypted
.... 0x0660: 5c43 f09b b347 556d ad85 35c1 07b9 55a6 \C...GUm..5...U. 0x0670: b55f 20ae b2b7 3a8a 6afc 89e3 5516 35c9 ._....:.j...U.5. 0x0680: 9303 7389 f539 0776 ee6f 4eb2 d1df aad8 ..s..9.v.oN..... 0x0690: 35bc 5b18 cbfd be8a 78b6 a559 f6ea 7455 5.[.....x..Y..tU 0x06a0: 332f cb63 f205 30fa a6c4 3226 59da 557e 3/.c..0...2&Y.U~ 0x06b0: df7c 5441 3890 8164 a7a5 aee0 3213 e439 .|TA8..d....2..9 0x06c0: c00f 723c 2118 c27c 9570 9a4b 824f 1a58 ..r<!..|.p.K.O.X 0x06d0: 3f14 7159 ccb3 d89a 1aee db5b 3fd2 f68a ?.qY.......[?... 0x06e0: 2b79 82a9 4be...