search for: 32p

...0 ? c? 'R?_????R_ ? ??? X:\I386\$OEM$\INSTALL\PWDWS0~Z . <_____> 02-01-07 7:42p .. <_____> 02-01-07 7:34p PHBN26~U EXE 1,467,521 01-23-06 6:17p PGADM BAT 63 10-30-06 7:51p PGSTART BAT 347 08-04-06 4:32p PGADMIN3 MSI 9,167,360 07-19-06 1:28p TDY24A~H EXE 2,267,719 09-13-06 4:23p OLD <_____> 10-30-06 7:44p UPGRADE BAT 996 03-14-06 9:38a PWDWS0~Z <_____> 02-01-07 7:42p 6 ? c<R? 12,904,006 ? c? 'R?_????R_ ? ??? X:\...

Hi, With help from Oleg we got the right patches applied and NFS working well. Maximum performance was about 60 MB/sec. Last week that dropped to about 12.5 MB/sec and I cannot find a reason. Lustre clients all obtain 100+ MB/sec on GigE. Each OST is good for 270 MB/sec. When mounting the client on one of the OSSs I get 230 MB/sec. Seems the speed is there. How can NFS and Lustre be tuned

I''ve noticed that the download repo doesn''t have a PAE (32p) install build. Is PAE currently broken in 3.0.2? Thank you, Brian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...000000fd97a0 cr2: 0000000000000000 > (XEN) ds: 0023 es: 0023 fs: 0030 gs: 0000 ss: 0010 cs: 0008 > qemu-dm[5399]: segfault at 00002aaba96ec000 rip 00002ab993166fe0 rsp > 00007fffff912188 error 6 > > (This is using a 64 bit host, but I see a similar crash with 32 and > 32p hosts). > > Just to confirm, 11161 in xen-unstable.hg is > > # HG changeset patch > # User chris@kneesaa.uk.xensource.com > # Date 1155812483 -3600 > # Node ID 5c1021595e3ce923ff11e338172d4639da2aecb5 > # Parent 5e3166de7120f474903d58bd74b7e2d12c3d8ea7 > [qemu] Add the...

...t the change from linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-686 to linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686 also changed the PAE mode of the Kernel? After installing this new version and and changeing the kernel in a domU config, I get: Error: (2, 'Invalid kernel', 'xc_dom_compat_check: guest type xen-3.0-x86_32p not supported by xen kernel, sorry\n') So, to run the domain with this new (security fix) Kernel, I have to reboot my whole Dom0, right? Henning

Hi Stefan, The problem is cause by the VBD/VNIF PCI device in DM checked in changeset 11160: PCI Device ID: 5853(Xen),class:ff80 (unknown) ACPI Window does not understand this device and can not find device driver associate with it. To verify this just revert the patches of changset 11161/11160 We are working on the fix now, revert patch is not the solution anyway... Thanks, Winston

I''ve just uploaded a new binary release of the GPL PV drivers for Windows - release 0.6.3. Fixes in this version are: . Should now work on any combination of front and backend bit widths (32, 32p, 64). Previous crashes that I thought were due to Intel arch were actually due to this problem. . The vbd driver will now not enumerate ''boot'' disks (eg those normally serviced by the emulated pci ide device) unless the xenhide driver is loaded which hides that pci ide device. Wit...

I''ve just uploaded a new binary release of the GPL PV drivers for Windows - release 0.6.3. Fixes in this version are: . Should now work on any combination of front and backend bit widths (32, 32p, 64). Previous crashes that I thought were due to Intel arch were actually due to this problem. . The vbd driver will now not enumerate ''boot'' disks (eg those normally serviced by the emulated pci ide device) unless the xenhide driver is loaded which hides that pci ide device. Wit...

...0/470Ôª ΢ÐÇ K7T266 Pro-RU/K7T2662LE £¤ 400/360Ôª ˶̩¿ËSL-75DRV5/ABIT KX7333 £¤ 340/400Ôª VIA P4X266/P4X266A îÑÌÚ P147/PEI1-SA £¤ 360/300Ôª ÃÀ´ïP4X266/ECS P4VXMS/ECS P4VXAD £¤ 340/300/310Ôª 3.ÏÔ¿¨ GF2 MX200 ¼¼¼Î GA-GF1280-32E £¤ 210Ôª ΢ÐÇ MX200/UNIKA ËÙÅä3000 £¤ 200/140Ôª GF2 MX400 ¼¼¼Î GV-GF1280-32P £¤ 210Ôª ά˶ MX400/³ÐÆôMX400 £¤ 230/240Ôª GF3 Ti200 Àǫ̈ s620(64MB)/UNIKAËÙÅäîÑ8200/128M £¤ 800/500Ôª GF3 Ti500 Àǫ̈ S650/ELSAÓ°À×Õß921£¤ 900/1700Ôª GF4 MX420 Æ߲ʺçîÑGF4MX420/ELSAÓ°À×Õß517SV £¤ 340/410Ôª ATi unika»ðÐý·çPOWER 858(RADEON8500)£¤ 505Ôª ˹°Í´ï¿Ë¾ªÌìÀØ/¾ªÌìÀØ8500 £¤610/950Ôª Matrox G4...