search for: 32cd4172

On Jan 18, 2011, at 12:32 AM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Hi, > > I tracked down a bug in indvars where we weren't updating SCEV properly. The attached patch shows the fix to this bug with a testcase, but it also causes five new test failures. Indvars isn't restructuring the loop there, so it ideally shouldn't need to call forgetLoop(). Offhand, is it possible that the problem

Hi, I tracked down a bug in indvars where we weren't updating SCEV properly. The attached patch shows the fix to this bug with a testcase, but it also causes five new test failures. Would someone be willing to take a look at the failures and figure out why we're getting worse output once this patch is applied? If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say that indvars is probably emitting code

...> LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110119/32cd4172/attachment.html>