search for: 32bitmicro

...icely for PPC target by merging r168189 and r168352 from the trunk into 3.2 release branch r168353. http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=168353 In any case at this point the above applies only to documentation changes. Pawel > > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:12 PM, 32bitmicro <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Are we going to have a mingw release this time? >> >> As far as I know there is no change from 3.1 and Mignw >> is considered experimental. >> >> Incidentally RC2 mingw32 binaries have bee...

Approved. Sorry for the delay. On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:27 PM, 32bitmicro <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > > > 32bitmicro <root at 32bitmicro.com> writes: > >> - Release Candidate 3 (RC3) > >> > >> RC3 will be created on Wednesday Dec 5th 10 p.m. PST. Please let me > >> know if there are any patches for release...

Alright, can you please pull in r169280? On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 12/4/2012 10:14 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > > What is the procedure for updating the release notes? I've been > committing > > changes to the trunk version, should I be editing them elsewhere? Or > will > > the trunk version be merged in? &gt...

...change from 3.1 and Mignw is considered experimental. Incidentally RC2 mingw32 binaries have been uploaded and are available for download and testing. http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.2/rc2/clang+llvm-3.2rc2-i386-mingw32-EXPERIMENTAL.tar.gz Pawel > > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:54 PM, 32bitmicro <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> - State of the 3.2 release >> >> Release is progressing as scheduled, RC2 has >> been created and is being tested. RC2 sources >> and binaries can be downloaded from: >> >> http://llvm...

What is the procedure for updating the release notes? I've been committing changes to the trunk version, should I be editing them elsewhere? Or will the trunk version be merged in? On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:12 PM, 32bitmicro <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > Are we going to have a mingw release this time? > > As far as I know there is no change from 3.1 and Mignw > is considered experimental. > > Incidentally RC2 mingw32 binaries have been uploaded > and are available fo...

Hello, - State of the 3.2 release Release is progressing as scheduled, RC2 has been created and is being tested. RC2 sources and binaries can be downloaded from: http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.2/rc2/ - Release notes and documentation With RC2 the 3.2 release has reached the point where it is feature complete and we can turn the attention to updating documentation, especially the release

> 32bitmicro <root at 32bitmicro.com> writes: >> - Release Candidate 3 (RC3) >> >> RC3 will be created on Wednesday Dec 5th 10 p.m. PST. Please let me >> know if there are any patches for release stopping issues that should >> be included in the RC3. > > Is the fix fo...

32bitmicro <root at 32bitmicro.com> writes: > - Release Candidate 3 (RC3) > > RC3 will be created on Wednesday Dec 5th 10 p.m. PST. Please let me > know if there are any patches for release stopping issues that should > be included in the RC3. Is the fix for 14465 important enough for t...

Are we going to have a mingw release this time? On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:54 PM, 32bitmicro <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > Hello, > > - State of the 3.2 release > > Release is progressing as scheduled, RC2 has > been created and is being tested. RC2 sources > and binaries can be downloaded from: > > http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.2/rc2/ > > >...

On 1/10/2013 12:11 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> writes: > >> Clang is good enough to bootstrap itself on practically >> any platform I can think of or it can be cross-bootstrapped >> if needed. > > You're completely ignoring communities that compile code outside > llvm+clang. Any compiler chosen by t...

...on the website. This is the only way how you can fix all the weird stuff you done in a moment. All: If anyone has the old taball + sig please let me know where I can download them to replace the current ones if Pawel will fail to do so. On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:51 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Krame...

...et approval from all the code owners and then we would have to merge and test. Frankly, I do not see how we could get all that done without delaying the release, RC2 deadline is today at 10p.m. PST. Pawel > > Thank you. > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Just a quick reminder that the November 29th (10p.m. PST) is the >> end of Phase 1 testing and Release Candidate 2 (RC2) deadline. >> After RC2 deadline, LLVM-Clang 3.2 release will be considered feature >> complete and no ne...

Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> writes: > Clang is good enough to bootstrap itself on practically > any platform I can think of or it can be cross-bootstrapped > if needed. You're completely ignoring communities that compile code outside llvm+clang. Any compiler chosen by that group has to be able to corr...

.../lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-January/058088.html Paweł > > All: If anyone has the old taball + sig please let me know where I can > download them to replace the current ones if Pawel will fail to do so. > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: >> On 1/11/2013 2:51 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +...

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> > >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski > >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>&gt...

On Nov 16, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > >>> This approach is fine for casual reader but >>> does not work for scripting or any automated >>> way of dealing with the build. >> Will you please clarify how the automation / scripting helps with the >> patch approval process? >...

Hello, I have been following this discussion for a while and I think the question we should be asking is: Why do we want to even bother with all these other broken C++ compilers in a first place? Clang is good enough to bootstrap itself on practically any platform I can think of or it can be cross-bootstrapped if needed. I think usage of any language features should be decided based on

On 1/11/2013 2:51 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >>>> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: >>&...

On Nov 16, 2012, at 2:17 PM, 32bitmicro <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Recent code owner activities have led to > what I would call loss of referential integrity > in the CODE_OWNERS.TXT file. > > Changes are fine but the information in the > CODE_OWNERS.TXT does not allow to positively >...

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 1/10/2013 12:11 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > > Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> writes: > > > >> Clang is good enough to bootstrap itself on practically > >> any platform I can think of or it can be cross-bootstrapped > >>...