search for: 32959306

...rnal(nchar) which requires 3 >> >> Cheers >> Joris > > > I'm seeing a similar problem. IIUC, the Windows binary .zip from CRAN of > any package using base::nchar is affected. Could someone check my answer > here is correct please : http://stackoverflow.com/a/32959306/403310 Nobody has posted a simple reproducible example here, so it's kind of hard to say. I would have guessed that a change to the internal signature of the C code underlying nchar() wouldn't have any effect on a package that called the R nchar() function. When I put together my own exa...

Hi all, I have a puzzling problem related to nchar. In R 3.2.1, the internal nchar gained an extra argument (see https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-announce/2015/000586.html) I've been testing code using the package copula, and at home I'm still running R 3.2.0 (I know, I know...). When trying the following code, I got an error: > library(copula) > fgmCopula(0.8) Error in

...gt; Joris > > > > > > I'm seeing a similar problem. IIUC, the Windows binary .zip from > CRAN of > > any package using base::nchar is affected. Could someone check my > answer > > here is correct please : http://stackoverflow.com/a/32959306/403310 > > Nobody has posted a simple reproducible example here, so it's kind of > hard to say. > > I would have guessed that a change to the internal signature of the C > code underlying nchar() wouldn't have any effect on a package that > called...

...s > > > > > > > > > I'm seeing a similar problem. IIUC, the Windows binary .zip from CRAN > > > of any package using base::nchar is affected. Could someone check my > > > answer here is correct please : > > > http://stackoverflow.com/a/32959306/403310 > > > > Nobody has posted a simple reproducible example here, so it's kind of > hard to > > say. > > > > I would have guessed that a change to the internal signature of the C > code > > underlying nchar() wouldn't have any effect on a p...

...t;> > >> Cheers > >> Joris > > > > > > I'm seeing a similar problem. IIUC, the Windows binary .zip from CRAN of > > any package using base::nchar is affected. Could someone check my answer > > here is correct please : http://stackoverflow.com/a/32959306/403310 > > Nobody has posted a simple reproducible example here, so it's kind of > hard to say. > > I would have guessed that a change to the internal signature of the C > code underlying nchar() wouldn't have any effect on a package that > called the R nchar() function...

...gt; Cheers > >> Joris > > > > > > I'm seeing a similar problem. IIUC, the Windows binary .zip from CRAN > > of any package using base::nchar is affected. Could someone check my > > answer here is correct please : > > http://stackoverflow.com/a/32959306/403310 > > Nobody has posted a simple reproducible example here, so it's kind of hard to > say. > > I would have guessed that a change to the internal signature of the C code > underlying nchar() wouldn't have any effect on a package that called the R > nchar()...

...t;> > >> Cheers > >> Joris > > > > > > I'm seeing a similar problem. IIUC, the Windows binary .zip from CRAN of > > any package using base::nchar is affected. Could someone check my answer > > here is correct please : http://stackoverflow.com/a/32959306/403310 > > Nobody has posted a simple reproducible example here, so it's kind of > hard to say. > You're free to try the simple reproducible example I've provided in my original question. Tried that out on 3 different computers, and I got the same behaviour 3 times. >...

...ers > >> Joris > > > > > > I'm seeing a similar problem. IIUC, the Windows binary .zip from CRAN of > > any package using base::nchar is affected. Could someone check my answer > > here is correct please : http://stackoverflow.com/a/32959306/403310 > > Nobody has posted a simple reproducible example here, so it's kind of > hard to say. > > > You're free to try the simple reproducible example I've provided in my > original question. Tried that out on 3 different computers, and I got > the s...