Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "3284992".
2013 Sep 16
2
Numbers behind "df" and "tune2fs"
Hello guys,
I have some difficulties to understand what really are the numbers
behing "df" and tune2fs. You'll find the output of tune2fs and df
below, on which my maths are based.
Here are my maths:
A tune2fs on an ext3 FS tell me the FS size is 3284992 block large. It
also tell me that the size of one block is 4096 (bytes if I'm not
wrong?). So my maths tell me that the disk is 3284992 * 4096 =
13455327232 bytes or 13455327232 / 1024 /1024 /1024 = 12.53 GB.
A df --block-size=1 on the same FS tell me the disk is 13243846656
which is 211480576...
2013 Sep 16
2
Re: Numbers behind "df" and "tune2fs"
...ave some difficulties to understand what really are the numbers
>> behing "df" and tune2fs. You'll find the output of tune2fs and df
>> below, on which my maths are based.
>>
>> Here are my maths:
>>
>> A tune2fs on an ext3 FS tell me the FS size is 3284992 block large. It
>> also tell me that the size of one block is 4096 (bytes if I'm not
>> wrong?). So my maths tell me that the disk is 3284992 * 4096 =
>> 13455327232 bytes or 13455327232 / 1024 /1024 /1024 = 12.53 GB.
>>
>> A df --block-size=1 on the same FS tell m...
2013 Sep 16
0
Re: Numbers behind "df" and "tune2fs"
...o guys,
>
> I have some difficulties to understand what really are the numbers
> behing "df" and tune2fs. You'll find the output of tune2fs and df
> below, on which my maths are based.
>
> Here are my maths:
>
> A tune2fs on an ext3 FS tell me the FS size is 3284992 block large. It
> also tell me that the size of one block is 4096 (bytes if I'm not
> wrong?). So my maths tell me that the disk is 3284992 * 4096 =
> 13455327232 bytes or 13455327232 / 1024 /1024 /1024 = 12.53 GB.
>
> A df --block-size=1 on the same FS tell me the disk is 13243...
2013 Sep 16
0
Re: Numbers behind "df" and "tune2fs"
...understand what really are the numbers
>>> behing "df" and tune2fs. You'll find the output of tune2fs and df
>>> below, on which my maths are based.
>>>
>>> Here are my maths:
>>>
>>> A tune2fs on an ext3 FS tell me the FS size is 3284992 block large. It
>>> also tell me that the size of one block is 4096 (bytes if I'm not
>>> wrong?). So my maths tell me that the disk is 3284992 * 4096 =
>>> 13455327232 bytes or 13455327232 / 1024 /1024 /1024 = 12.53 GB.
>>>
>>> A df --block-size=1 o...
2013 Sep 17
2
Re: Numbers behind "df" and "tune2fs"
...are the numbers
>>>> behing "df" and tune2fs. You'll find the output of tune2fs and df
>>>> below, on which my maths are based.
>>>>
>>>> Here are my maths:
>>>>
>>>> A tune2fs on an ext3 FS tell me the FS size is 3284992 block large. It
>>>> also tell me that the size of one block is 4096 (bytes if I'm not
>>>> wrong?). So my maths tell me that the disk is 3284992 * 4096 =
>>>> 13455327232 bytes or 13455327232 / 1024 /1024 /1024 = 12.53 GB.
>>>>
>>>> A...
2013 Sep 17
0
Re: Numbers behind "df" and "tune2fs"
...>>> behing "df" and tune2fs. You'll find the output of tune2fs and df
>>>>> below, on which my maths are based.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are my maths:
>>>>>
>>>>> A tune2fs on an ext3 FS tell me the FS size is 3284992 block large. It
>>>>> also tell me that the size of one block is 4096 (bytes if I'm not
>>>>> wrong?). So my maths tell me that the disk is 3284992 * 4096 =
>>>>> 13455327232 bytes or 13455327232 / 1024 /1024 /1024 = 12.53 GB.
>>>>>
&g...