search for: 3280

...manuals do not clearly state which setting this is on the handsets. I have enabled DTMF logging and spoken to the SIP provider, but they couldn't really help much. I presume the issue is local to our phone system but other than the logs below, have nothing to go on: [2015-06-10 09:32:26] DTMF[3280][C-0000c5a1] channel.c: DTMF begin '2' received on SIP/sip-out-00021c6d [2015-06-10 09:32:26] DTMF[3280][C-0000c5a1] channel.c: DTMF begin passthrough '2' on SIP/sip-out-00021c6d [2015-06-10 09:32:26] DTMF[3280][C-0000c5a1] channel.c: DTMF end '2' received on SIP/sip-out-000...

..._noanswer: Peer '<user>' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 203 [Jun 7 11:46:29] NOTICE[88483]: chan_sip.c:19842 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer '<user>' is now Reachable. (1888ms / 2000ms) When I call on this phone I get: [Jun 7 11:40:47] WARNING[88483]: chan_sip.c:3280 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2c992000 (len 599) to 192.168.0.200:36129 returned -2: Invalid argument [Jun 7 11:41:01] WARNING[88483]: chan_sip.c:3280 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x2c992000 (len 599) to 192.168.0.200:36129 returned -2: Invalid argument [Jun 7 11:41:15] WARNING[88483]: chan_sip.c:3280 _...

...Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2019:3286 Critical CentOS 7 php Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2019:3281 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEEA-2019:3280 CentOS 6 nspr Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CEEA-2019:3280 CentOS 6 nss-util Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CEEA-2019:3280 CentOS 6 nss-softokn Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CEEA-2019:3280 CentOS 6 nss Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2019:3...

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2019:3280 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:3280 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 1d3ff6e3e00c338c5afad2934ced1be065cec2d46df814da71a4f660378e504c nspr-4.21.0-1.el6_10.i686.rpm 2e3cfda21...

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2019:3280 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:3280 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 74fe18ae5942abd981c453b4aed84c819e7106ead64c27937f587ef7fcfb7fd4 nss-util-3.44.0-1.el6_10.i686.rpm f4d11...

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2019:3280 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:3280 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f1debe8d9e2d4714262b7c840fb732616485d24c1b0dcbc94861fff14004feb0 nss-softokn-3.44.0-5.el6_10.i686.rpm 02...

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2019:3280 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:3280 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 1743ed7e5d97dbc7c595b6256e49bf10f50bc76ddf276ce3fe591e808544df52 nss-3.44.0-7.el6_10.i686.rpm 9231cee266...

...manuals do not clearly state which setting this is on the handsets. I have enabled DTMF logging and spoken to the SIP provider, but they couldn't really help much. I presume the issue is local to our phone system but other than the logs below, have nothing to go on: [2015-06-10 09:32:26] DTMF[3280][C-0000c5a1] channel.c: DTMF begin '2' received on SIP/sip-out-00021c6d [2015-06-10 09:32:26] DTMF[3280][C-0000c5a1] channel.c: DTMF begin passthrough '2' on SIP/sip-out-00021c6d [2015-06-10 09:32:26] DTMF[3280][C-0000c5a1] channel.c: DTMF end '2' received on SIP/sip-out-000...

...manuals do not clearly state which setting this is on the handsets. I have enabled DTMF logging and spoken to the SIP provider, but they couldn't really help much. I presume the issue is local to our phone system but other than the logs below, have nothing to go on: [2015-06-10 09:32:26] DTMF[3280][C-0000c5a1] channel.c: DTMF begin '2' received on SIP/sip-out-00021c6d [2015-06-10 09:32:26] DTMF[3280][C-0000c5a1] channel.c: DTMF begin passthrough '2' on SIP/sip-out-00021c6d [2015-06-10 09:32:26] DTMF[3280][C-0000c5a1] channel.c: DTMF end '2' received on SIP/sip-out-000...

...0: fifo: INTR 00000001: 00000003 821 nouveau 0000:03:00.0: fifo: SCHED_ERROR 13 [] 1 nouveau 0000:03:00.0: fifo: PBDMA0: 00000002 [] ch 6 [0000000000 unknown] subc 0 mthd 001c data 00000002 3637 nouveau 0000:03:00.0: fifo: SCHED_ERROR 13 [] 1 nouveau 0000:03:00.0: x-terminal-emul[3280]: failed to idle channel 5 [x-terminal-emul[3280]] 446 nouveau 0000:03:00.0: fifo: SCHED_ERROR 13 [] 1 nouveau 0000:03:00.0: x-terminal-emul[3280]: failed to idle channel 5 [x-terminal-emul[3280]] 60 nouveau 0000:03:00.0: fifo: SCHED_ERROR 13 [] 1 nouveau 0000:03:00.0: timeout...

hello, I am attempting to compile a Dom0 CentOS 5.2 guest from source, using XenLinux 2.6.18.8 with a Xen 3.2.1 hypervisor. I am able to compile the Dom0 kernel, but when I attempt to boot into it, I receive the following messages: mount: could not find filesystem ''/dev/root'' setuproot: moving /dev failed: No such file or directory setuproot: error mounting /proc: No such

...s/libcxx-3.4.2/include/algorithm:624, from /home/bemineni/llvm/llvm-3.4.2/projects/libcxx-3.4.2/include/string:439, from /home/bemineni/llvm/llvm-3.4.2/projects/libcxx-3.4.2/src/string.cpp:12: /home/bemineni/llvm/llvm-3.4.2/projects/libcxx-3.4.2/include/type_traits:3280: error: expected primary-expression before ‘decltype’ /home/bemineni/llvm/llvm-3.4.2/projects/libcxx-3.4.2/include/type_traits:3280: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘decltype’ In file included from /home/bemineni/llvm/llvm-3.4.2/projects/libcxx-3.4.2/include/algorithm:626, from /home/be...

...is good for VoIP. However, in my > opinion (and that of others) is that the price in terms of bit-rate is > too high and you might as well just add redundancy by transmitting > some > packets more than once (as proposed in > http://www.icassp2004.com/Papers/viewpapers.asp?papernum=3280 ). For > instance, if it goes to 20% packet loss, then transmitting 8 kbps > Speex > packets twice (4% effective loss) will be much better than iLBC at 15 > kbps. I think you'd have to look at how Speex (using PLC) compares to iLBC (using PLC) to make an accurate comparison her...

...roblems on playing 192k mp3 on https. The stream play 2 second and stop, on http we have not that problem. (we restart the encoder, but same problem) (we use a jPlayer and direct stream url in chrome) We check on the error log, but no errors and in the access log we see: 2001:980:79b3:0:b1cd:e5ab:3280:e9bd - - [03/Sep/2018:17:24:00 +0200] "GET /live HTTP/1.1" 200 11648 "https://www.domein.nl/" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/68.0.3440.106 Safari/537.36" 2 Its not a IPv6 problem we have this problem on IPv4. B...

...of my use of list(order(...)). Thanks for any help you can give, -Pat Dr. Patrick D. Lorch plorch at email.unc.edu http://www.unc.edu/~plorch/lorch.html Department of Biology W: 919-843-2320 University of North Carolina F: 919-962-1625 at Chapel Hill CB#3280, Coker Hall Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280 USA

...me. I can send an example plot to anyone that wants one. Thanks, -Pat Dr. Patrick D. Lorch plorch at email.unc.edu http://www.unc.edu/~plorch/lorch.html Department of Biology W: 919-843-2320 University of North Carolina F: 919-962-1625 at Chapel Hill CB#3280, Coker Hall Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280 USA

...-comment on your computer has more features than the one you sent in August :-) Any chance you could send a more recent copy? In any case, I've updated the --help output for the -s option, and also added a manual page with the same info, in doc/oggz-comment.1.sgml (in svn.annodex.net changeset:3280). cheers, Conrad. On 07/11/2007, Kangyuan Niu <kangyuan.niu@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, the oggz-comment.c on my computer has > > void help() { > printf("Usage: oggz-comment filename [options] tagname=tagvalue ...\n"); > printf("Options:\n"); >...

Hi, Is there any comparison made between Speex and iLBC free codec? How would they compare in terms of quality, bitrate and CPU utilization? Thanks, Joe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20050610/b79a3f46/attachment.htm

...r, in my > > opinion (and that of others) is that the price in terms of bit-rate is > > too high and you might as well just add redundancy by transmitting > > some > > packets more than once (as proposed in > > http://www.icassp2004.com/Papers/viewpapers.asp?papernum=3280 ). For > > instance, if it goes to 20% packet loss, then transmitting 8 kbps > > Speex > > packets twice (4% effective loss) will be much better than iLBC at 15 > > kbps. > > I think you'd have to look at how Speex (using PLC) compares to iLBC > (using PLC)...

...353 Mean :1.383e-05 3rd Qu.:13.75 3rd Qu.:252 3rd Qu.: 95.508 3rd Qu.:2.530e-05 Max. :22.00 Max. :252 Max. :305.972 Max. :3.240e-05 Any help on what I am doing wrong on the coding would be very helpful. Thanks a lot. Mukta -- Department of Biology Wilson Hall, Rm. 316 CB#3280, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280. Ph: (919) 962 1445