Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "327581".
Did you mean:
32758
2011 Jan 11
2
aggregate.formula implicitly removes rows containing NA
The documentation for `aggregate` makes it sound like aggregate.formula should behave identically to aggregate.data.frame (apart from the way the parameters are passed). But it looks like aggregate.formula is quietly removing rows where any of the "output" variables (those on the LHS of the formula) are NA. This differs from how aggregate.data.frame works. Is this expected behavior?