search for: 32560

...<optimized out>, max_recent_msgs=<optimized out>, mailbox=<optimized out>, conn=0x55c7b9370df0) at master-connection.c:205 box = 0x55c7b938ef18 status = {messages = 463652304, recent = 32764, unseen = 1, uidvalidity = 0, uidnext = 4225857431, first_unseen_seq = 32560, first_recent_uid = 4226053086, last_cached_seq = 32560, highest_modseq = 94316285707297, highest_pvt_modseq = 94316294200320, keywords = 0x7f30fbe17797 <__x86_return_thunk+5>, permanent_flags = 4226053495, flags = 32560, permanent_keywords = true, allow_new_keywords = t...

...I don't have anything against making the switch. For the record, here's a summary of issues that were deferred for later on (some of which are optimization-ish and we might decide to never do at -O0 at all): * Crash in RegBankSelect for half fp types: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 * Improving constant placement: http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32561 * Fancy switch lowering * Transforming division-by-constant-power-of-2 into right shift AFAICT all the other issues that were brought up were fixed (yay!). Cheers, Diana On 11 May 2017 at 08:44, Kristof Beyls via llvm-de...

...e to sync again. Kristof and I have been trying to keep the scratchpad document here [1] up to date, but I'll try to summarize things on the mailing list as well: We still have a few bugs open that we should fix or at least discuss before turning GlobalISel on by default at O0 for AArch64: * PR32560 - A crash in regbank select [2] * PR32550 - Floating point values moving a lot through GPRs [3] * PR32561 - Improve placement of constants [4] * Optional - improve handling of switch statements (I think we don't even have a bug open for this, but it has been brought up) Unrelated to O0, here a...

...making the > switch. > > For the record, here's a summary of issues that were deferred for > later on (some of which are optimization-ish and we might decide to > never do at -O0 at all): > * Crash in RegBankSelect for half fp types: > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 > > > I’ll have a look. > > * Improving constant placement: http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32561 > > > I’ve commented in the PR to mention the localizer technic I was playing > with, if someone wants to give it a try. > > * Fancy switch lowering > * Transfo...

Hi all, At the EuroLLVM BoF people asked where the design discussions around GlobalISel take place. Naturally, a lot of them take place at Apple, since they have the highest density of co-located GlobalISel devs, but we also have some in Phab. For those of you that are interested, please have a look at the following topics - discussions are progressing rather slowly and we definitely

...or the record, here's a summary of issues that were deferred for > >> later on (some of which are optimization-ish and we might decide to > >> never do at -O0 at all): > >> * Crash in RegBankSelect for half fp types: > >> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 > >> > >> > >> I’ll have a look. > >> > >> * Improving constant placement: > http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32561 > >> > >> > >> I’ve commented in the PR to mention the localizer technic I was playing > >> wit...

...ary of issues that were deferred for >>> >> later on (some of which are optimization-ish and we might decide to >>> >> never do at -O0 at all): >>> >> * Crash in RegBankSelect for half fp types: >>> >> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I’ll have a look. >>> >> >>> >> * Improving constant placement: >>> >> http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32561 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I’ve com...

...making the > switch. > > For the record, here's a summary of issues that were deferred for > later on (some of which are optimization-ish and we might decide to > never do at -O0 at all): > * Crash in RegBankSelect for half fp types: > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 > > > I’ll have a look. > > * Improving constant placement: > http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32561 > > > I’ve commented in the PR to mention the localizer technic I was playing > with, if someone wants to give it a try. > > * Fancy switch lowering > * Tr...

...t; For the record, here's a summary of issues that were deferred for >>> later on (some of which are optimization-ish and we might decide to >>> never do at -O0 at all): >>> * Crash in RegBankSelect for half fp types: >>> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 >>> >>> >>> I’ll have a look. >>> >>> * Improving constant placement: >>> http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32561 >>> >>> >>> I’ve commented in the PR to mention the localizer technic I was playing >>> with...

With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0.19. Here is a summary of the changes: * Allow :: notation in IPv6 Subnets. * Add support for systemd style socket activation. * Allow environment variables to be used for the Name option. * Add basic support for SOCKS proxies, HTTP proxies, and proxying through an external command. This version of tinc is compatible with 1.0pre8, 1.0

With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0.19. Here is a summary of the changes: * Allow :: notation in IPv6 Subnets. * Add support for systemd style socket activation. * Allow environment variables to be used for the Name option. * Add basic support for SOCKS proxies, HTTP proxies, and proxying through an external command. This version of tinc is compatible with 1.0pre8, 1.0

Is there an easy way to reject all incoming packets except those that come from certain IPs? I can't find any way via iptables or via the GUI provided with CentOS (or another GUI for CentOS) without having to resort to Shorewall. It's fine if the answer is "go with Shorewall". I just didn't want to have to become a Shorewall expert for this really small task. Any help/advice

...making the > switch. > > For the record, here's a summary of issues that were deferred for > later on (some of which are optimization-ish and we might decide to > never do at -O0 at all): > * Crash in RegBankSelect for half fp types: > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32560 > > > I’ll have a look. > > * Improving constant placement: > http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32561 > > > I’ve commented in the PR to mention the localizer technic I was playing > with, if someone wants to give it a try. > > * Fancy switch lowering > * Tr...

> On May 9, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Kristof, > >> On May 9, 2017, at 3:41 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com <mailto:kristof.beyls at arm.com>> wrote: >> >> Great Quentin :). >> >> I've rerun the benchmarks comparing "-O0 -g" with "-O0 -g