search for: 3250cb08

On Jun 13, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > Hi all, > > When trying to generate a VFCmp instruction when UnsafeFPMath is set > to true I get an assert “Unexpected CondCode” on my x86 system. This > also happens with UnsafeFPMath set to false and using an unordered > compare. Could someone look into this? Please provide a testcase. > > While I’m at it, is

...ets, including SPU, Alpha, etc. The commonality was that the MSB is set, and we would like to add support for vector shifting at some point. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080616/3250cb08/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: fibonacci.cpp URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080616/3250cb08/attachment.ksh>

Hi all, When trying to generate a VFCmp instruction when UnsafeFPMath is set to true I get an assert "Unexpected CondCode" on my x86 system. This also happens with UnsafeFPMath set to false and using an unordered compare. Could someone look into this? While I'm at it, is there any reason why only the most significant bit of the return value of VFCmp is defined (according to