Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "3211264".
2013 Jun 25
1
Re: Permission denied
...c21a8baf.vmss
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8684 Jun 24 20:18 WinXPPro.nvram
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2145255424 Jun 24 20:12 WinXPPro-s001.vmdk
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2146238464 Jun 24 20:33 WinXPPro-s002.vmdk
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2146631680 Jun 24 20:25 WinXPPro-s003.vmdk
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3211264 Jun 24 20:12 WinXPPro-s004.vmdk
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2106261504 Jun 24 20:18 WinXPPro-s005.vmdk
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2146697216 Jun 24 20:00 WinXPPro-s006.vmdk
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2162688 Jun 24 20:27 WinXPPro-s007.vmdk
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 2146107392 Jun 24 20:06 WinXPPro-s008.vmdk
-rw...
2013 Jun 25
2
Permission denied
...684 Jun 24 20:18 WinXPPro.nvram
-rw----r-x 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 2145255424 Jun 24 20:12 WinXPPro-s001.vmdk
-rw----r-x 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 2146238464 Jun 24 20:33 WinXPPro-s002.vmdk
-rw----r-x 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 2146631680 Jun 24 20:25 WinXPPro-s003.vmdk
-rw----r-x 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 3211264 Jun 24 20:12 WinXPPro-s004.vmdk
-rw----r-x 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 2106261504 Jun 24 20:18 WinXPPro-s005.vmdk
-rw----r-x 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 2146697216 Jun 24 20:00 WinXPPro-s006.vmdk
-rw----r-x 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 2162688 Jun 24 20:27 WinXPPro-s007.vmdk
-rw----r-x 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 21...
2002 Dec 11
0
Re: your mail
...2 ql=0 pa=0 f:
> > > htb*c10080 m=2 t=-45721 c=12161 pq=0 df=1998848 ql=0 pa=0 f:
> > > htb*c10091 m=2 t=163300 c=46975 pq=0 df=44982272 ql=0 pa=0 f:
> > > htb*c10109 m=2 t=168099 c=48174 pq=0 df=60000000 ql=0 pa=0 f:
> > > htb*c10118 m=2 t=163300 c=46975 pq=0 df=3211264 ql=0 pa=0 f:
> > > htb*c10081 m=2 t=-68763 c=8738 pq=0 df=229376 ql=0 pa=0 f:
> > > htb*c10090 m=2 t=163300 c=46975 pq=0 df=60000000 ql=0 pa=0 f:
> > > htb*c10108 m=2 t=168099 c=28187 pq=0 df=60000000 ql=0 pa=0 f:
> > > htb*c10119 m=2 t=-203578 c=-21102 pq=0 df=5...
2007 Nov 05
13
preallocate CPU usage - pre4
When I use the preallocate patch and create a 77GB file using the function I
get a CPU spike on the server-side. The spike lasts about 20 minutes and
uses about 20%-25% of the cpu associated with the rsync instance creating
the file. The spike is directly linked to the time it takes to create the
file.
I compiled rsync using cygwin CVS. I initially suspected the implementation
of
2018 Mar 01
29
[Bug 13317] New: rsync returns success when target filesystem is full
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317
Bug ID: 13317
Summary: rsync returns success when target filesystem is full
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: x64
OS: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org