search for: 32.85

hello, Sorry to jump straight in with a question, but I've searched the archive[0] and I'm pretty sure the answer's not there. I'm using dovecot to replace courier imap, so authentication is by vpopmail and the Maildirs are stored in the usual domains/domain/user/ Maildir. Everything seems to work very well, and setting it up has been easy, so thank you very much for that.

I apologize that I've asked a similar question before, but being new to R I don't think I did a very good job of formating the question. I've included a text file since the date set is somewhat large. What I have is a huge string of numbers in a text file. The numbers are all separated by comma's and the groups are separated by a semicolon. What I would like to do is read each

Hey guys, I've got dovecot configured to work perfectly for virtual users across different domains. It's great. My problem is that, as far as I can tell, dovecot makes me use one SSL certificate across all my domains. That's not what I want. Is there a way I can get dovecot to use the cert for mail.foo.com when somebody is logging into a foo.com account, and the cert for

To anyone who can help: I have two brief questions concerning sapply. Following below is the code for my example. The two problems are described at the end of the code: site <- rep(2:6, each = 12) tillage <- rep(c(1,-1), each = 6, times = 5) carbon <- c(18.23, 16.06, 17.81, 16.07, 17.26, 17.08, 14.92, 15.88, 12.11, 14.23, 16.99, 13.57, 20.34, 20.3,

Compañeros, Una de primero de funciones pero que no soy capaz de resolver. Necesito evaluar como texto el parámetro de mi función. Ejemplo: datos.A<-rnorm(10,3) datos.B<-rnorm(100,30) datos.C<-rnorm(1000,300) datos.D<-rnorm(10000,3000) describe <- function(letra){ summary(datos.letra) } describe(B) Quiero que haga summary(datos.B) y no soy capaz. Nunca me había visto en una

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:16 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > Ralf, et al., > > > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > >

I understand that this problem may have very little to do with CentOs, but it happens to occur on a CentOS webserver and maybe you?ll have a clue. Since a few months, after many upgrades on several blogs (now running with PHP7), our server is eating up RAM no end. PHP processes swell to over 2 GB (each) and when the whole RAM and the whole swap are full, problems stack up and finally paralyze the

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Ralf, et al., > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > > additional benchmark results. > > > > First, these are preliminary

The current llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 2.6 branch passes all of the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks built with its gfortran. The results compare as follows... Compile Command : gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n benchmark gcc-4.2.4 llvm-gcc-svn llvm-gcc-2.6 llvm-gcc-2.6 at -m32 20081031 -m32 at -m32 at -m64 ac 18.30

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > Ralf, et al., > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > additional benchmark results. > > First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things > necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the

Ralf, et al., Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains additional benchmark results. First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for discussion.

Hi List, I recently upgraded one of our high-volume SMB servers from samba 3.x to samba 4.1.12 (also changing the OS). Now I have a strange problem. The CPU load on the server is very high, processes that are causing it are nslcd or since I changed to it sssd and the smbd processes themselves. ? Top looks like this: --------------------------------- PID USER????? PR? NI? VIRT? RES? SHR S

Hi, We did some performance test and found the create/delete files performance of btrfs is very poor. The test is that we create 50000 files and measure the file-create time first, and then delete these 50000 files and measure the file-delete time. (The attached file is the reproduce program) The result is following: (Unit: second) Create file performance BtrFS Ext4 Total times: