search for: 32.53

Hi, I have a list of fit objects (fit objects from HMISC functions) I create elements in the list in this way lrm.sumtot <- lrm( ae7bepn ~ trarm + sumtot , data=sd.fix) lrm.list[['lrm.sumtot']] <- lrm.sumtot And I can run (anova(lrm.sumtot)) The following also gives the anova I'd expect zz <- lrm.list[['lrm.sumtot']];anova(zz) And similarly for the summary

Duncan, With the commit from http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121203/158488.html, the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks complete again on x86_64-apple-darwin12. The result are similar to what were seen with FSF gcc 4.6.2svn and llvm/dragonegg 3.0 (which was the last release that passed pb05) http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2011-October/044091.html. Jack

Is anyone else having major I/O peaks due to logrotate or other jobs running simultaneously across multiple guests. I have one KVM server running Centos 5.4 with local disk that is seriously suffering as most of the guests rotate their syslog at the same time. Looking at the KVM server I'm seeing 11:00:01 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 03:40:01 AM

Hi Jack, thanks for these numbers. > With the commit from http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121203/158488.html, > the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks complete again on x86_64-apple-darwin12. The result are similar to what > were seen with FSF gcc 4.6.2svn and llvm/dragonegg 3.0 (which was the last release that passed pb05) >

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:16 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > Ralf, et al., > > > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > >

Hi Dirk, Thank you so much for looking into this when you got home. I greatly appreciate it. I was actually in the midst of writing to everyone the following message: ?. ?. ?. Hi All, I have some good news. ? My docker image is now up-to-date with R version 4.4.1. I first had to clear a bunch of unused data using docker system prune ?force. Apparently, it cleared over 32.53 gigs of data, and

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Ralf, et al., > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > > additional benchmark results. > > > > First, these are preliminary

Lauren, little oversight from my Dockerfile, if you want to follow the CRAN steps and get the R from the cloud.r-project.org server, you want to replace && add-apt-repository -y "ppa:marutter/rrutter4.0" With && add-apt-repository "deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs)-cran40/" The ppa repo is Michael Rutter personal repo

Hi Marco, Thank you for the follow up email. In the line below, do I replace $(lsb-release -cs) with jammy (Ubuntu 22.04) or leave it alone: Add-apt-repository ?deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu jammy-cran40/? It?s good to know about installations for Bioconductor. I am not currently using it, but I may need it in the future for other projects. Br, Lauren -- Lauren J. Gerber

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > Ralf, et al., > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > additional benchmark results. > > First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things > necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the

Ralf, et al., Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains additional benchmark results. First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for discussion.

Lauren, I am now back home where looking into these things is a little easier. From your first email to me, I started off with the selenium container you mentioned as your starting point. And that basically is your issue. It is a 'high-level' container, and it sets a user. (Essentially) all other Dockerfiles you have seen and been pointed at are 'lower-level' and operate as root

Yes, keep the $(lsb-release -cs) there. This allows you to change the version of the OS without having to change anything else (for instance we are migrating all of our docker to 24.04 LTS right now, so we only have to modify the FROM entry and all of our Dockerfile will still work). From: Gerber, Lauren J <lauren.gerber at helsinki.fi> Date: Thursday, July 11, 2024 at 2:21?AM To:

rucker222 wrote: > The drop down layer selection menu at the top left of the screen directly above where the drawing 1 tab is opens upwards off of the screen once the drawing has a few layers on it. jjmckenzie wrote: > Log file please. I loaded a drawing with plenty of layers and then clicked on the layer drop down menu a couple of times before exiting ProgeCAD. Log file below. (sorry

As multi-queue nics were commonly used for high-end servers, current single queue based tap can not satisfy the requirement of scaling guest network performance as the numbers of vcpus increase. So the following series implements multiple queue support in tun/tap. In order to take advantages of this, a multi-queue capable driver and qemu were also needed. I just rebase the latest version of

As multi-queue nics were commonly used for high-end servers, current single queue based tap can not satisfy the requirement of scaling guest network performance as the numbers of vcpus increase. So the following series implements multiple queue support in tun/tap. In order to take advantages of this, a multi-queue capable driver and qemu were also needed. I just rebase the latest version of