search for: 31966877

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "31966877".

Did you mean: 3166876
2004 Sep 10
3
Re: nice idea
--- Miroslav Lichvar <lichvarm@phoenix.inf.upol.cz> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:51:02AM -0500, Brady Patterson wrote: > > ... But it seems to me that you could make a decent guess > > about when something "new" happens based on the second derivative > of the signal > > (where the first derivative is the difference between a given > sample and the