search for: 31701

...ry 13, 2006 4:46 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Extensions.conf error - 'Maximum Include level(10) exceeded' Can someone tell me why the following from extensions.conf generates this error on asterisk load? Jan 13 09:27:24 WARNING[31701]: config.c:938 ast_config_internal_load: Maximum Include level (10) exceeded As far as I can tell I don't have a DEPTH of 10 includes. I certainly have more than 10 include statements, but I don't have them drilled down to a depth of 10. I'm thinking the error text is wrong. Maybe you...

Can someone tell me why the following from extensions.conf generates this error on asterisk load? Jan 13 09:27:24 WARNING[31701]: config.c:938 ast_config_internal_load: Maximum Include level (10) exceeded As far as I can tell I don't have a DEPTH of 10 includes. I certainly have more than 10 include statements, but I don't have them drilled down to a depth of 10. I'm thinking the error text is wrong. Maybe you...

Hello Everyone, I'm running the x86_64 bit version of CentOS 4 on a dual AMD Opteron server. The graphics card is an ATI Radeon X300. At the moment, Xorg is configured to use the open source driver, radeon. The server itself is connected to a KVM switch, which has otherwise not caused any issues. Recently, the virtual terminals have started to go blank and then not come back. What I mean

...ers Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion >Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Extensions.conf error - 'Maximum Include >level(10) exceeded' > > >Can someone tell me why the following from extensions.conf generates this error on asterisk load? > >Jan 13 09:27:24 WARNING[31701]: config.c:938 ast_config_internal_load: Maximum Include level (10) exceeded > >As far as I can tell I don't have a DEPTH of 10 includes. I certainly have more than 10 include statements, but I don't have them drilled down to a depth of 10. I'm thinking the error text is wrong....

Hi all, I''ve been looking at a potential problem, as documented here: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/19241 To do with a leak within the KahaDB persistence layer of ActiveMQ. Specifically, there are reports of the db.data file growing unbounded: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3956 I''m hoping to find out information from other PuppetDB users to see if this is

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...104508 0 0.02 104492 0 0.02 104092 emitter.ll 1 25010 0 0.01 24981 0 0.01 24981 encode.ll 2 15460 0 0.01 15424 0 0.01 15424 endgame.ll 1 17397 0 0.01 17371 0 0.01 17371 EndianPortable.ll 13 15174 5 0.01 10262 3 0.01 11696 EnumDirItems.ll 22 358170 0 0.03 358135 0 0.04 358135 equiv.ll 2 31731 0 0.01 31701 0 0.01 31701 erase.ll 1 765 0 0.01 736 0 0.01 736 erc_api.ll 10 68842 0 0.01 68821 0 0.01 68821 erc_do_i.ll 6 90863 0 0.02 90842 0 0.02 90842 erc_do_p.ll 34 342346 0 0.03 342325 0 0.03 341133 err.ll 1 4487 0 0.01 4470 0 0.01 4470 errorconcealment.ll 3 19583 0 0.01 19562 0 0.01 19562 error.ll 1 6566...