search for: 313bf59

...h in turn will allow an implementation of .extents. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- plugins/nbd/nbd.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 183 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/plugins/nbd/nbd.c b/plugins/nbd/nbd.c index 14e6806..313bf59 100644 --- a/plugins/nbd/nbd.c +++ b/plugins/nbd/nbd.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* nbdkit - * Copyright (C) 2017-2018 Red Hat Inc. + * Copyright (C) 2017-2019 Red Hat Inc. * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following...

...iant server that is attempting to cause an information leak. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- plugins/nbd/nbd.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 212 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/plugins/nbd/nbd.c b/plugins/nbd/nbd.c index 313bf59..f729051 100644 --- a/plugins/nbd/nbd.c +++ b/plugins/nbd/nbd.c @@ -127,7 +127,9 @@ struct transaction { int fds[2]; } u; void *buf; + uint64_t offset; uint32_t count; + uint32_t err; struct transaction *next; }; @@ -137,6 +139,7 @@ struct handle { int fd; int flags; i...

I'm hoping to implement .extents for the nbd plugin; this is a prerequisite. I'm not sure about patch 3 - if we like it, I'll squash it to 2, if we don't, I think we are okay just dropping it. I'm also wondering if we have to worry about malicious plugins that don't populate the entire .pread buffer in an effort to get nbdkit to expose portions of the heap; my patch 7 loses